From jim@rfc1035.com  Tue Mar 19 17:51:03 2024
Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8976C151707
 for <dd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id i01OU7EtZkW1 for <dd@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (shaun.rfc1035.com [93.186.33.42])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 442B8C151701
 for <dd@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (dhcp-8280.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.130.128])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256
 bits)) (No client certificate requested)
 by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 065832420E4A;
 Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:50:52 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn3CSQPy17pbYjGB09z5yRsVO0aem0-DCyJfnJ5p4edZsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:50:48 +0000
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>,
 dd@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <DE95FA81-5C63-4DDD-A474-01C2FDE1E96D@rfc1035.com>
References: <CAKr6gn0e5f2tkhfq2yST88FHE9j77Hor7pMDkp_9rngbkHsdUg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240320002534.5DB2D85B4E2B@ary.qy>
 <CAKr6gn3CSQPy17pbYjGB09z5yRsVO0aem0-DCyJfnJ5p4edZsA@mail.gmail.com>
To: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dd/ZaFrZusx2PKpR6AuAORQlPSiFnY>
Subject: Re: [dd] DBOUND scope
X-BeenThere: dd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Delegation <dd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dd>,
 <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dd>,
 <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:51:03 -0000



> On 20 Mar 2024, at 00:28, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> wrote:
> 
> Keeping DBOUND in mind is good enough for me btw. I just don't want
> forbidden-to-discuss signs on a charter unless there's a clear reason
> why and (I guess) consensus.

+1. IMO the WG chairs (and ADs?) could be expected to police this.