Re: [dd] Challenges with DELEG awareness in DNSKEY
Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec> Wed, 20 March 2024 15:19 UTC
Return-Path: <roy@dnss.ec>
X-Original-To: dd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B04C1D4A9E for <dd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dnss.ec
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bCwNZIKFErF9 for <dd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84D53C180B5F for <dd@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-78a2a97c296so8785585a.2 for <dd@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dnss.ec; s=google; t=1710947966; x=1711552766; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=sn05fDhhCYjpCC+U8DGQ4LSdtu9gOU7jaf/rmM7uxcE=; b=Xg1Ndoun75JWroJWolUmQBpWUIxKdx/6UwgVPB4Uf2ABy2LmBpPt95LL0z6JhW1tUQ e5PtPyvYGx/WR7NiVnstYuVFm3cPAlRNXaSENHlyF7aMjyfxT9grlqnhrbuZwuoTJqSl gCCEJ2HaUmerGMwtFjBM9WFc2yFQtbZKKG0xw=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710947966; x=1711552766; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sn05fDhhCYjpCC+U8DGQ4LSdtu9gOU7jaf/rmM7uxcE=; b=GiHIBjqWDjRjXm3Y/I/5DNWrkxUUQ673r99CaaJlFLH1bq+Jf4RSKk7pmXRW00DHSl dp01C3jd6yeC6EHd228d691bt88x0ScjiEunnBQhefO2yYS/mTTxXAho3AAfcNQKuAM6 CwjpPY+TG+f+5z2KHchTLqZXolbDRWo3VWhsHl1bERbZiHSzKrPaQ0OmhxFb8gFCNQ1Y BdQWTJ2V0WzZWsuI3EHmRH5kRBX4/e1+OjzjtJp0aIB4QzsKoBB9JZZkk1lmSrkr3jFb bkxIarFBgCeAg5O97RBj5/UNNVo5EPSRBOY1qWJWL2Lyg4RZsnjfMQ1sqDvLhOM/2VDs i7yw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxM9I1AboGGsJtXF05qm046wkiyek1Bp6JQ0iqL7NH+UWaFJmpJ AMuv0TGKJZj9/kuGcQrjHf2Gl7+puTnfZn9B2FwIdFLY1XQYYmHuykAowFJTb1A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH6AtQy0XGipBv4mJETUYKvyMV/DPTPq9LqPpKKx4mTrMlm7eJk5I7OAezns51foBH9ImUKrg==
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:58a4:0:b0:691:698e:9299 with SMTP id ea4-20020ad458a4000000b00691698e9299mr4777954qvb.61.1710947966557; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([88.81.146.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id mm3-20020a0562145e8300b006964e162e23sm151331qvb.78.2024.03.20.08.19.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
From: Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>
In-Reply-To: <CAB1+oZ5vkivgegiL7CaAN9GKpymqgMiC+VpXr_1X--ohVcd4cQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:19:13 +0000
Cc: dd@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4ACA5E62-B870-45E6-96B4-C39FD0244B6B@dnss.ec>
References: <CAB1+oZ5vkivgegiL7CaAN9GKpymqgMiC+VpXr_1X--ohVcd4cQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bob Halley <bhalley=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dd/Zk0-jppiXORE3XknzWL0dkFJx2o>
Subject: Re: [dd] Challenges with DELEG awareness in DNSKEY
X-BeenThere: dd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Delegation <dd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dd>, <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dd>, <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:19:35 -0000
> On 20 Mar 2024, at 13:48, Bob Halley <bhalley=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > 1) The draft talks about “the DNSKEY record” but the DNSKEY RRset of > an authority may contain many keys. A dedicated DNSKEY, unused for signing, solely present for the purpose of signalling to a validating resolver that it should expect authenticated denial records in a delegation response, will do. Roy
- [dd] Challenges with DELEG awareness in DNSKEY Bob Halley
- Re: [dd] [Ext] Challenges with DELEG awareness in… Edward Lewis
- Re: [dd] Challenges with DELEG awareness in DNSKEY Roy Arends
- Re: [dd] Challenges with DELEG awareness in DNSKEY Petr Špaček