IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dd] Charter - objectives and scope

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Fri, 22 March 2024 02:12 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83B2C14F69C for <dd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 19:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hardakers.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UqxhMq4G_7Kh for <dd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 19:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [107.220.113.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51870C14F684 for <dd@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 19:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (dhcp-875e.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.135.94]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 593162003A; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 19:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.hardakers.net 593162003A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hardakers.net; s=default; t=1711073537; bh=ZDJP76AnUB7os6ywdSc5LwM3oe6G9ZbebgGTCIitkBs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=OzEdY6VAGMEfWj/U2omLX/jDVZZ2izjsfNGYGUhtCElZ+VCgDhM6JRze1fozx3qjL xc37pctg0ebJkl3DH3TsJdvU6zVP+3jdrGBCpwnF9Oqhi0DeMb6X7xcyp9lQcTG63s XRjwzIBABVYAD1KsOguKIztP2c1tWxDofHk59EHQ=
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>, "dd@ietf.org" <dd@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+GendnRjNcjLdc0hObEf1a1ctvnDogL=BmSMLa33_4bjA@mail.gmail.com> (Tim Wicinski's message of "Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:49:19 -0400")
References: <0521FB45-FC12-4297-8B17-41053137FF2E@icann.org> <CADyWQ+GendnRjNcjLdc0hObEf1a1ctvnDogL=BmSMLa33_4bjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 19:12:15 -0700
Message-ID: <ybly1ab6mm8.fsf@wx.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dd/b3SrOkTm-7SsdXD3Zddrz0Q_tIs>
Subject: Re: [dd] Charter - objectives and scope
X-BeenThere: dd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Delegation <dd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dd>, <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dd>, <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 02:12:23 -0000

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> writes:

> Instead of "should study possible negative consequences" perhaps say "should study
> for any operational issues" 

The way I phrased it in the updated charter was the requirement for including  Operational and Deployment considerations.  IE, we don't say positive or negative just that potential issues should be documented.  Do people find this insufficient?

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status