IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dd] [Ext] starting charter text for the DELEG BOF discussion

Geoff Huston <gih902@gmail.com> Wed, 20 March 2024 07:39 UTC

Return-Path: <gih902@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7BAC1D5C76 for <dd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.858
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.858 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BMmN5V4znq9j for <dd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oo1-xc29.google.com (mail-oo1-xc29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2DA5C1D5C7D for <dd@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oo1-xc29.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5a4789684abso3184851eaf.0 for <dd@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710920352; x=1711525152; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=5SChsmp6vFzu0r+e+XtrfwQgiZ0Ly009LVIRd1QxHpQ=; b=P2AhHWPqKeYo1xfJt11TW3NPGC0u8/jF3TfwbD4j0knXl+MQYOtYY6I62VugOOZajo 3lGJzVDoJUbrnZX+CpMHlf5aDxBQmB+juXXD9m3utKAlGa0DAiJtHTz+2dYLKV7+jeox 7yDMTJnjImuuAHWjFvodjs6wZuXCJFxS9i4EVf6V6EQgLKSIOIzXn0VY9/pPtnmCaTe/ pzGHQw2dC0Y2cAvaiaBFlbXa+CUPti0PQI811d7/idrXcSVOXq3Wl2elqLuZHA2uXsfg h3B8YwbEGhq3vkzSpYZPxZkk8VpJeyrcwG+TR7gv1OWFpSZ2X3QN9OFQD+Fhhqe8PI7w Q44A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710920352; x=1711525152; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5SChsmp6vFzu0r+e+XtrfwQgiZ0Ly009LVIRd1QxHpQ=; b=cS88cpakBqEYUIHFPfxTZ3AXOMgnpoCQiye9MmJnMI/UV5v0iG1Iyfevufh1OfTFmC nyCrGQHUfhOFIWk8oe5782q/xOEb0ICkCcGw7JEzE3RlxB4tCBtDN89O/C3CoxBUz9EK vxoKxmIvOpG4gp8XzuDQkb+5PwIleF16lg70aOmwR2IboavkU+HSvgBlIWp9KiKFIkMC 1OrOYmFYDdEB7m42KimtL+9IMBMNvjx2ImtOk4yU5euMjWsvOPnxSVtEvJIZF/O7BP6C iBVEzE5WGHWwMScePuSXBZIb/pHfijX5D6Yezp4l50zeS9lmrjR4X3k+jJ1eD1/yokVd 8A0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxdxK4HGVuTQeGOXncAP9RzMWJBGOUYEEfy48oAlaqR4VGsTh+I bqIcrVyIaW0XqIUYbVmqGUW6TniYdj/rEhprTeG6NxqJh9MM5Lj4GKbYiMMY
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGCsp9/0S7l+J5Md5GMPpmn2wtbRJQ0I5dR1qmYaVMQaIztG5tNEI6Qkt2EvkDS2VWwrfZtqw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6358:8aa:b0:17f:1cb9:1c15 with SMTP id m42-20020a05635808aa00b0017f1cb91c15mr1403662rwj.17.1710920351695; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([103.210.27.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z8-20020a63c048000000b005c6e8fa9f24sm10356900pgi.49.2024.03.20.00.39.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
From: Geoff Huston <gih902@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn2MksS4rcWUeO8ey+edcic6PqpreFOfRoEDsAOi98N3WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 17:38:57 +1000
Cc: dd@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <352DA8F3-FAFB-45F7-9C07-6CBB0143240D@gmail.com>
References: <yblbk7wl65k.fsf@wx.hardakers.net> <D3E1CFCD-D078-42AB-9049-08BE5D7968FF@icann.org> <20240319.192031.779472543197418519.he@uninett.no> <26106.33066.79339.949428@gro.dd.org> <CAKr6gn2MksS4rcWUeO8ey+edcic6PqpreFOfRoEDsAOi98N3WQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dd/naVSQMnC769s8eksmzQX3TMRkhs>
Subject: Re: [dd] [Ext] starting charter text for the DELEG BOF discussion
X-BeenThere: dd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Delegation <dd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dd>, <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dd>, <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 07:39:47 -0000

I'm curious - why should a DELEG-like delegation referral point to precisely the same nameserver names as NS records? (if that is what you are saying here) What consideration motivates such a constraint?

A zone can be served by multiple nameservers with distinct names, In theory couldn't DELEG be regarded as just more nameserver records?

Another G


> On 20 Mar 2024, at 5:17 PM, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> wrote:
> 
> A DELEG record shared over EPP or a functional equivalent should be capable of expressing the information in an NS record, obviating the need to say the same thing twice to your parent through a registrar.
> 
> On the wire, some might argue for on the fly synthesis. But concrete instantiation simply shouldn't conflict.
> 
> G

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status