Re: [dd] Charter issue: Introduction of new signaling

Geoff Huston <gih902@gmail.com> Fri, 22 March 2024 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <gih902@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961D1C151079 for <dd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.858
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.858 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YhgkajdN2OAN for <dd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54532C14F70C for <dd@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6e709e0c123so1335204b3a.1 for <dd@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1711066588; x=1711671388; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=prELIt1lOztZXsBR0Wora4x/NrM1xN4qz7GFFnqoWHI=; b=IZUkkCt/Otb0QQwFETHXMqXVnQw9GMUNXNL4PG81NSHr7uhscPJmtjRurzViI+ef1I 968TKsGKwf6io9CdlGhrwL6rhrnzE8EiXoHB3hs0ZqWH6icc/4KI/fkPXzkLxbJ8H8/U uK7HhuGkvtBb0yzrtJA6KD7sap+Jklk0FWCwCSb3n4S9/KzSl8dZAgE7aONDmRAE8A4q YmG++wM6gsTSy3ROjfjmlTSpm10oYzW6lgCxgZDTjV6WzNX/ZnDD71PdiKp/09C6nRZM L/2iQzmmETJlbWM2jDE3Ld663GfIrRPm4T+To8bDtGWcCX+4v6gUJC/yuhBUbqFNPgMh xOJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711066588; x=1711671388; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=prELIt1lOztZXsBR0Wora4x/NrM1xN4qz7GFFnqoWHI=; b=Nnf70xFB0swvjIzBFt38wzwSQWd0uQJqCkYkE3g9//AYeP8qsh3l+r6JXL1nsWYZyG u5aGfP8Fmv/GWkoRgs07uUDCXoppJ3EwRIkhwlwnIwpagyL2HBY8q1jlpHBVYd1pLW/l V7P39phSyKIwuMnVMf9rMdi6FBkLsxZ7dGJ1HN530rVAar1Htlp1aSJd3NAVq0pMXZlC idG6Pt5iJYcT3dvBkn9kAiM0P+nwIm+KlCGyhORqOcuZUewEXzNBDAJklj37/ZqDOsE+ sXn1g5bsoJnNe266frZXtciL/JmXtIDqikVM0WDAzeUeweLDB63IivHKEiiq2asXh3Ed nCpA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzYOJwr4tCqvcaXN2uftvhVjfrpHsSviEaQXr4Arc5FLlKl7AQh pIeSQ3r2K9uKmFYt+O1lgzruYqmQN+99We72tljmfHBcsYQOQ/yJ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH8EWauE4yOvwiulIeLiiCQ8PhwfYYqEGaXZ8vk3EX/5AtNcZWqscX/EX5jjCwyXywTn6NxoA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b705:b0:1e0:8e7:3107 with SMTP id d5-20020a170902b70500b001e008e73107mr977715pls.39.1711066587574; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (60-242-98-186.static.tpgi.com.au. [60.242.98.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n4-20020a170902dc8400b001ddb4df7f70sm458906pld.304.2024.03.21.17.16.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
From: Geoff Huston <gih902@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B90115A2-22DC-41AD-9D6A-68801C38CE07@icann.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:16:13 +1000
Cc: "dd@ietf.org" <dd@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E53A53D7-FAD8-41A3-A14B-6399E37F0C5A@gmail.com>
References: <49CC837E-4D8E-45CF-A0B5-7A28A82B1939@icann.org> <2CD3FF34-28B7-4A40-A68B-1E20EF4CB6C9@gmail.com> <B90115A2-22DC-41AD-9D6A-68801C38CE07@icann.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dd/osfrRozB4R26p6ipOQT4lB7-eKI>
Subject: Re: [dd] Charter issue: Introduction of new signaling
X-BeenThere: dd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Delegation <dd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dd>, <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dd>, <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 00:16:32 -0000


> On 21 Mar 2024, at 6:30 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mar 21, 2024, at 18:16, Geoff Huston <gih902@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 3. The objective talks about new signalling methods, yet makes no mention of the nature of this introduction of such new mechanisms. It sould be reasonable to either say explicitly "fully backward compatible", or at a minimum note that the scope of the work should include consideration of deployment models that permit existing and new signalling models to coexist across various deployment scenarios.
> 
> My no-hats interpretation is that this would be part of the requirements document.
> 

The deciding line between defining constraints up front in the charter and listing constrains in a requirements document is unclear to me at this level of detail. It's not a big thing for me whichever way it goes. 

Geoff