IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [decade] DECADE WG to be closed

Songhaibin <haibin.song@huawei.com> Sat, 29 September 2012 02:38 UTC

Return-Path: <haibin.song@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: decade@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: decade@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C8321F845C; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 19:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.181
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.181 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.418, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AKNInDPMkSkT; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 19:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB4321F844D; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 19:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ALD65275; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 02:38:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 03:35:16 +0100
Received: from SZXEML435-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.72.61.63) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 03:36:14 +0100
Received: from SZXEML534-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.70]) by szxeml435-hub.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:36:07 +0800
From: Songhaibin <haibin.song@huawei.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Thread-Topic: [decade] DECADE WG to be closed
Thread-Index: AQHNmy4NeTF1FP7MtkORFrVdv9nRf5ee6t6wgACe2q6AARDdYA==
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 02:36:06 +0000
Message-ID: <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F23B36CFD@szxeml534-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <50531AB3.6090601@neclab.eu> <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F23B31E95@szxeml534-mbx.china.huawei.com> <50583257.2080404@neclab.eu> <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F23B33FA6@szxeml534-mbx.china.huawei.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120925072708.098586a0@resistor.net> <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F23B366A5@szxeml534-mbx.china.huawei.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120928005916.0aed8b00@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120928005916.0aed8b00@elandnews.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.123]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "decade@ietf.org" <decade@ietf.org>, "appsdir@ietf.org" <appsdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [decade] DECADE WG to be closed
X-BeenThere: decade@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "To start the discussion on DECoupled Application Data Enroute, to discuss the in-network data storage for p2p applications and its access protocol" <decade.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/decade>, <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/decade>
List-Post: <mailto:decade@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/decade>, <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 02:38:17 -0000

Hi,

Here are the public emails sent by Akbar when the architecture document was updated. And they were only sent to the decade@ietf.org, I would like it had been copied to apps-discuss@ietf.org. 

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/decade/current/msg00682.html
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/decade/current/msg00681.html

And yes, you do not have to ask the reviewers to check. I was only asking their personal will in polite.

BR,
-Haibin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: S Moonesamy [mailto:sm+ietf@elandsys.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 5:30 PM
> To: Songhaibin
> Cc: appsdir@ietf.org; decade@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [decade] DECADE WG to be closed
> 
> Hello,
> At 17:38 27-09-2012, Songhaibin wrote:
> >Part of the resolution to comments (Carsten's and David
> >Harrington's) were recorded in the document sent out by Akbar to the
> >DECADE list several days ago. It might be easier to check with that
> >one. It was for the discussion in June.
> 
> There were three reviews from the Applications Area Directorate for
> drafts from the DECADE WG:
> 
>   23 Jan 2012
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg04174.html
>   22 Mar 2012
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg04704.html
>   22 Mar 2012
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg04705.html
> 
> The reviews could be summarized as "the drafts are not ready for
> publication as a RFC".  The reviewers explained why they came to such
> a conclusion.  The reviews were posted to apps-discuss@ietf.org, an
> open mailing list, so that anyone can comment.  There wasn't any
> timely follow-up on any of these reviews.
> 
> According to the message at
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/decade/current/msg00805.html the
> Decoupled Application Data Enroute (decade) working group in the
> Transport Area has concluded.  Given the closure of the DECADE WG I
> don't have a good reason to ask the reviewers to check the
> "resolution to comments".
> 
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email