Re: [decade] DECADE WG to be closed

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 28 September 2012 09:47 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: decade@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: decade@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CBD521F85C0; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 02:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.579
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.579 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZlqI+RyOdIry; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 02:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D528521F85BB; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 02:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.236.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8S9kncj005663 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 02:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1348825621; bh=iP9OIuaoEwEqjgSkfuYXC4Il3XGftfA3v2fzP/wOkV4=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=0qPwrZ2+Ypejvd1DnCsLSCO3BIzpAVO9bEa35ea308asq0IkSZQ6mbLOulocEWYxv UPo6AckVUNhrLx/oD3QvxoygitpZ/1kC4Iu/vStAGdP62+h9TSUFZxRYsvjPFV4GzA 9UF6JLwPn0hDu5oqphRpD0PjWbTNHAIKBjwv7SHc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1348825621; i=@elandsys.com; bh=iP9OIuaoEwEqjgSkfuYXC4Il3XGftfA3v2fzP/wOkV4=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=27ZizW27zow7ARytrZgXCpvo9FjYADkSZMeX2nUOSVI+AVm2Xf6FFncjsS4VBXDhg Yewh8u3uT32wrDHmaHD1F1yn/pMrZVzTPKUTiskkdbyyy4k8HhbWhVwIQcTUYeLI7X P1VnReb3yPuXxcrFkgRRpRfQZWU20d8RiSADf82Y=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120928005916.0aed8b00@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 02:30:16 -0700
To: Songhaibin <haibin.song@huawei.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F23B366A5@szxeml534-mbx.chi na.huawei.com>
References: <50531AB3.6090601@neclab.eu> <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F23B31E95@szxeml534-mbx.china.huawei.com> <50583257.2080404@neclab.eu> <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F23B33FA6@szxeml534-mbx.china.huawei.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120925072708.098586a0@resistor.net> <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F23B366A5@szxeml534-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 05:38:10 -0700
Cc: decade@ietf.org, appsdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [decade] DECADE WG to be closed
X-BeenThere: decade@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "To start the discussion on DECoupled Application Data Enroute, to discuss the in-network data storage for p2p applications and its access protocol" <decade.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/decade>, <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/decade>
List-Post: <mailto:decade@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/decade>, <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:47:54 -0000

Hello,
At 17:38 27-09-2012, Songhaibin wrote:
>Part of the resolution to comments (Carsten's and David 
>Harrington's) were recorded in the document sent out by Akbar to the 
>DECADE list several days ago. It might be easier to check with that 
>one. It was for the discussion in June.

There were three reviews from the Applications Area Directorate for 
drafts from the DECADE WG:

  23 Jan 2012 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg04174.html
  22 Mar 2012 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg04704.html
  22 Mar 2012 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg04705.html

The reviews could be summarized as "the drafts are not ready for 
publication as a RFC".  The reviewers explained why they came to such 
a conclusion.  The reviews were posted to apps-discuss@ietf.org, an 
open mailing list, so that anyone can comment.  There wasn't any 
timely follow-up on any of these reviews.

According to the message at 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/decade/current/msg00805.html the 
Decoupled Application Data Enroute (decade) working group in the 
Transport Area has concluded.  Given the closure of the DECADE WG I 
don't have a good reason to ask the reviewers to check the 
"resolution to comments".

Regards,
S. Moonesamy