Re: [decade] Open Issue-3 (draft "An HTTP-based DECADE ResourceProtocol")

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 18 September 2012 08:34 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: decade@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: decade@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0922421F8780 for <decade@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 01:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OHkPft+NGW51 for <decade@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 01:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scss.tcd.ie (hermes.scss.tcd.ie [IPv6:2001:770:10:200:889f:cdff:fe8d:ccd2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A9021F877F for <DECADE@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 01:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4992171480; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:34:12 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date:message-id:received :received:x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t=1347957252; bh=+2l6YtjJAKgPmF IR0k+poeJ5f3bVbyiUEA70j4+uhl0=; b=PB4GM1g0Vre4LgduoD2f97kKLUrxrz OlwIlrGCwMKYJS0QuIeYyN1IEahNop/SuJNYIB8Y2mOALp2wNge4Nww+t6jUKpak r1cV1MdVUIe9ibtVicGT9MJ8NjhEqDqQ/nvBqCGuCMAPJJYHGgjaTzA31fmQoPhB 25YiTKrzZjmO8obofImzxc1JNDIrygLDvg/aDPfeYJ8UpAaY1uAXgDbPndpdGf0k G/+SZZR+QlUqR4yVBAOkUXe4vAog8Zr4uPWDHt1GA+oUdnAx30Jacf43/sqyeIGE l4vFmNxVzyPrBvI/IGmfh3lK2XYZlKB5aiwxq0MkR7dJ7dmPHjnwWBqg==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id 67hot9uUfF4Q; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:34:12 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [192.6.10.155] (bri-event-56.hpl.hp.com [192.6.10.155]) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7AF0171476; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:34:02 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <505831F8.3010209@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:34:00 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Songhaibin <haibin.song@huawei.com>
References: <AFD688AF30E249418739DBDC55B9C75B34D7C3B4@SZXEML507-MBS.china.huawei.com> <D60519DB022FFA48974A25955FFEC08C04B130A5@SAM.InterDigital.com> <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F23B31EAF@szxeml534-mbx.china.huawei.com> <7B31966F-AA1F-4BBA-9095-0F65053A8F9D@gmail.com> <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F23B324A9@szxeml534-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F23B324A9@szxeml534-mbx.china.huawei.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "DECADE@ietf.org" <DECADE@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [decade] Open Issue-3 (draft "An HTTP-based DECADE ResourceProtocol")
X-BeenThere: decade@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "To start the discussion on DECoupled Application Data Enroute, to discuss the in-network data storage for p2p applications and its access protocol" <decade.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/decade>, <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/decade>
List-Post: <mailto:decade@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/decade>, <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 08:34:19 -0000

On 09/18/2012 08:08 AM, Songhaibin wrote:
> Hi Peng,
> 
> "Low" does not mean no existence. I'm wondering if two different objects are happened to have the same name at the same DECADE server, or at different DECADE servers with different service providers (we require the name to be global unique), we should have a collision avoidance mechanism for it.

The existence of SHA256 collisions would be news that would make
CNN and BBC probably (after they picked it up from /.:-). In
this case "low" is practically the same as non-existent if you
use all the bits of SHA256.

S.

> -Haibin
> 
> 
> From: Peng Zhang [mailto:pzhang.thu@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 2:10 PM
> To: Songhaibin
> Cc: Rahman, Akbar; Wangdanhua; DECADE@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [decade] Open Issue-3 (draft "An HTTP-based DECADE ResourceProtocol")
> 
> Hi Haibin,
> 
>      I don't quite understand your question. If we are using SHA-256, as suggested in draft-farrell-decade-ni, the probability that two different objects have the same name would be very low.
> 
> BR,
> 
> Peng.
> 
> On Sep 17, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Songhaibin wrote:
> 
> 
> While many people advocate Hashed names, the key point is, shall we allow conflict for the names? If we do not allow, how to solve it.
> 
> BR,
> -Haibin
> 
> From: decade-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:decade-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:decade-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rahman, Akbar
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 10:31 PM
> To: Wangdanhua
> Cc: DECADE@ietf.org<mailto:DECADE@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [decade] Open Issue-3 (draft "An HTTP-based DECADE ResourceProtocol")
> 
> Hi Danhua,
> 
> Yes, I agree that to make progress on your draft you need to show how to use a naming scheme as part of your proposal.  And I also agree that using the draft-farrell-decade-ni should be the starting point.
> 
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> 
> Akbar
> 
> From: decade-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:decade-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:decade-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Wangdanhua
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 2:13 AM
> To: DECADE@ietf.org<mailto:DECADE@ietf.org>
> Subject: [decade] Open Issue-3 (draft "An HTTP-based DECADE ResourceProtocol")
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> The following is the third open issue left for "An HTTP-based DECADE Resource Protocol" (draft-wang-drp). We're looking forward to your opinions and comments.
> 
> About the object naming scheme used in DECADE Protocol, we're inclined to adopting the naming scheme proposed in the draft-farrell-decade-ni (Naming Things with Hashes). We thought it's a good scheme and we are planning to have a try and see whether it's workable in the protocol we proposed.
> 
> Does anybody have other opinions? And we'd like to hear your voice.
> 
> Best wishes,
> Danhua Wang
> 
> 
>