Re: [decade] DECADE WG to be closed

S Moonesamy <> Tue, 25 September 2012 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0591F0C7E; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.577
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.577 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.022, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tGXYGmGpfKUE; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA8F1F0C54; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8PFDm43012314 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail2010; t=1348586041; bh=UNJL4V+9+MvaDf/bkL+wpdlwzomp7NkLAWEUpov1rtM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=u+sL6m0HBrReszVWyd/vXal6gX+yHN4booJHjhHTvitbq0nmupBgcGZteltXybFQq eQcd9O6nCzvOrzr+4DnY1hJ/qv2uHM0+SLWyl1LOjB7mBaQlz7mWAky6WlFUutRmqR sJka+TB7oyHko/mb32MHI1Z6qXbk/x5YniH16zQA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1348586041;; bh=UNJL4V+9+MvaDf/bkL+wpdlwzomp7NkLAWEUpov1rtM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=mw45IWaqd9+37nKfpwuB5AWFbU3s0KoKyWm5A7BgBd4knlvQKau9dZTBDuwhZpDH4 8o2G9D7035T9AJijeLJILbey1gQT8sDr/fLR0rJisZFRVYAJLhagvmOp9Nv6UmZhSg SJjsrjJsFRQSTuHPE8XV4jF6C9NCKMGosn85fKSQ=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:57:16 -0700
From: S Moonesamy <>
In-Reply-To: <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F23B33FA6@szxeml534-mbx.chi>
References: <> <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:16:52 -0700
Subject: Re: [decade] DECADE WG to be closed
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "To start the discussion on DECoupled Application Data Enroute, to discuss the in-network data storage for p2p applications and its access protocol" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:14:05 -0000

At 23:52 21-09-2012, Songhaibin wrote:
>I believe all those comments were addressed in the current draft, as 
>I joined the discussion with the authors to address the comments. 
>Their efforts should be respected. The authors and I would like Dave 
>and Carsten to check the draft with their comments, if they are 
>interested. While I admit answering in the mailing list is a main 
>method to resolve comments, but it is not the only method.

The Applications Directorate reviewers have volunteered their free 
time and effort to perform these reviews.  It is a disincentive to 
the reviewers if they have to track WG drafts to determine whether 
their comments have been addressed.

S. Moonesamy