Re: [decade] Open Issue-3 (draft "An HTTP-based DECADE ResourceProtocol")

"Rahman, Akbar" <> Wed, 12 September 2012 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7703821F8618 for <>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.356
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.356 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.242, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0SnPQCeiYqn8 for <>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D41A21F8613 for <>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([]) by with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:31:07 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CD90F3.3EFF43C8"
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:31:06 -0400
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Thread-Topic: [decade] Open Issue-3 (draft "An HTTP-based DECADE ResourceProtocol")
Thread-Index: Ac2QrbZ/PXLu2UrYSaS5JxQFT3PHzAARRvvg
References: <>
From: "Rahman, Akbar" <>
To: "Wangdanhua" <>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Sep 2012 14:31:07.0132 (UTC) FILETIME=[3EF52BC0:01CD90F3]
Subject: Re: [decade] Open Issue-3 (draft "An HTTP-based DECADE ResourceProtocol")
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "To start the discussion on DECoupled Application Data Enroute, to discuss the in-network data storage for p2p applications and its access protocol" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:31:12 -0000

Hi Danhua,


Yes, I agree that to make progress on your draft you need to show how to
use a naming scheme as part of your proposal.  And I also agree that
using the draft-farrell-decade-ni should be the starting point.








From: [] On Behalf
Of Wangdanhua
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 2:13 AM
Subject: [decade] Open Issue-3 (draft "An HTTP-based DECADE



Hi all,


The following is the third open issue left for "An HTTP-based DECADE
Resource Protocol" (draft-wang-drp). We're looking forward to your
opinions and comments.


About the object naming scheme used in DECADE Protocol, we're inclined
to adopting the naming scheme proposed in the draft-farrell-decade-ni
(Naming Things with Hashes). We thought it's a good scheme and we are
planning to have a try and see whether it's workable in the protocol we


Does anybody have other opinions? And we'd like to hear your voice.


Best wishes,

Danhua Wang