Re: [decade] Open Issue-3 (draft "An HTTP-based DECADE ResourceProtocol")

"Rahman, Akbar" <Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com> Wed, 12 September 2012 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com>
X-Original-To: decade@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: decade@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7703821F8618 for <decade@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.356
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.356 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.242, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0SnPQCeiYqn8 for <decade@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from idcout.InterDigital.com (smtp-out1.interdigital.com [64.208.228.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D41A21F8613 for <DECADE@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SAM.InterDigital.com ([10.30.2.11]) by idcout.InterDigital.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:31:07 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CD90F3.3EFF43C8"
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:31:06 -0400
Message-ID: <D60519DB022FFA48974A25955FFEC08C04B130A5@SAM.InterDigital.com>
In-Reply-To: <AFD688AF30E249418739DBDC55B9C75B34D7C3B4@SZXEML507-MBS.china.huawei.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [decade] Open Issue-3 (draft "An HTTP-based DECADE ResourceProtocol")
Thread-Index: Ac2QrbZ/PXLu2UrYSaS5JxQFT3PHzAARRvvg
References: <AFD688AF30E249418739DBDC55B9C75B34D7C3B4@SZXEML507-MBS.china.huawei.com>
From: "Rahman, Akbar" <Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com>
To: "Wangdanhua" <wangdanhua@huawei.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Sep 2012 14:31:07.0132 (UTC) FILETIME=[3EF52BC0:01CD90F3]
Cc: DECADE@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [decade] Open Issue-3 (draft "An HTTP-based DECADE ResourceProtocol")
X-BeenThere: decade@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "To start the discussion on DECoupled Application Data Enroute, to discuss the in-network data storage for p2p applications and its access protocol" <decade.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/decade>, <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/decade>
List-Post: <mailto:decade@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/decade>, <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:31:12 -0000

Hi Danhua,

 

Yes, I agree that to make progress on your draft you need to show how to
use a naming scheme as part of your proposal.  And I also agree that
using the draft-farrell-decade-ni should be the starting point.

 

 

Sincerely,

 

 

Akbar

 

From: decade-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:decade-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Wangdanhua
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 2:13 AM
To: DECADE@ietf.org
Subject: [decade] Open Issue-3 (draft "An HTTP-based DECADE
ResourceProtocol")

 

 

Hi all,

 

The following is the third open issue left for "An HTTP-based DECADE
Resource Protocol" (draft-wang-drp). We're looking forward to your
opinions and comments.

 

About the object naming scheme used in DECADE Protocol, we're inclined
to adopting the naming scheme proposed in the draft-farrell-decade-ni
(Naming Things with Hashes). We thought it's a good scheme and we are
planning to have a try and see whether it's workable in the protocol we
proposed.

 

Does anybody have other opinions? And we'd like to hear your voice.

 

Best wishes,

Danhua Wang