Re: [decade] WG Action: Conclusion of Decoupled Application Data Enroute (decade)

Carsten Bormann <> Fri, 21 September 2012 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B823A21F875C for <>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 06:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.249
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SNwpNH3mVFKq for <>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 06:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D123D21F87F3 for <>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 06:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q8LDXRcg009905; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:33:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [] ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BED1DB7; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:33:27 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.1 \(1498\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Carsten Bormann <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:33:28 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <> <>
To: Martin Stiemerling <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1498)
Subject: Re: [decade] WG Action: Conclusion of Decoupled Application Data Enroute (decade)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "To start the discussion on DECoupled Application Data Enroute, to discuss the in-network data storage for p2p applications and its access protocol" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:33:40 -0000

On Sep 20, 2012, at 11:53, Martin Stiemerling <> wrote:

> But you may resubmit those drafts as individual submissions, address the review received so far, e.g., Dave Crocker's, Carsten Bormann's, and the AD reviews. Ask for feedback again, if you have addressed the reviews in your updated drafts.

Let me just say that, although I haven't had much time to invest in this work after my initial review, I'm certainly available for continued review.
Maybe the authors can take the closure of the WG as an opportunity to relieve themselves of some of the too many strings pulling on this.

Focus more sharply, nail things down, and it may still work out.

If you need some cheering up, consider that -- outside the confines of the WG -- draft-farrell-decade-ni did work out, as it did exactly this focusing and nailing down.

Grüße, Carsten