Re: [decade] Open Issue-4 (draft "An HTTP-based DECADE ResourceProtocol")

zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com> Thu, 20 September 2012 09:34 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: decade@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: decade@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9888A21F8704 for <decade@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 02:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -96.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.386, BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RELAY_IS_221=2.222, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P4+lWxbR85cQ for <decade@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 02:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imss.chinamobile.com (imss.chinamobile.com [221.130.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE63C21F8701 for <DECADE@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 02:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imss.chinamobile.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.chinamobile.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4375DE684; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:34:10 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mail.chinamobile.com (unknown [10.1.28.22]) by imss.chinamobile.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCAB1E678; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:34:09 +0800 (CST)
Received: from zyf-PC ([10.2.54.163]) by mail.chinamobile.com (Lotus Domino Release 6.5.6) with ESMTP id 2012092017340544-21192 ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:34:05 +0800
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:33:55 +0800
From: zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
To: Wangdanhua <wangdanhua@huawei.com>, decade <DECADE@ietf.org>
References: <AFD688AF30E249418739DBDC55B9C75B34D7C893@SZXEML507-MBS.china.huawei.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.85[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2012092017335583939015@chinamobile.com>
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on jtgsml01/servers/cmcc(Release 6.5.6|March 06, 2007) at 2012-09-20 17:34:07, Serialize by Router on jtgsml01/servers/cmcc(Release 6.5.6|March 06, 2007) at 2012-09-20 17:34:09, Serialize complete at 2012-09-20 17:34:09
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart708023327108_=----"
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.8231-6.8.0.1017-19196.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--30.639-7.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--30.639-7.0-31-10;No--30.639-7.0-31-10
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No;No
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No;No
Subject: Re: [decade] Open Issue-4 (draft "An HTTP-based DECADE ResourceProtocol")
X-BeenThere: decade@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
List-Id: "To start the discussion on DECoupled Application Data Enroute, to discuss the in-network data storage for p2p applications and its access protocol" <decade.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/decade>, <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/decade>
List-Post: <mailto:decade@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/decade>, <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:34:11 -0000

Hi Danhua,
   Could you elaborate your imagination on the use case of the push mode SDT? For me it seems okay to use push mode  for publish/subscribe apps, e.g., the DECADE server, on behalf of DECADE client, subscribes a magazine and only notifies the DECADE client in case of good network condition.

BR
Yunfei




zhangyunfei

From: Wangdanhua
Date: 2012-09-20 17:08
To: DECADE@ietf.org
Subject: [decade] Open Issue-4 (draft "An HTTP-based DECADE ResourceProtocol")
Hi all,
 
The following is the forth open issue left for “An HTTP-based DECADE Resource Protocol” (draft-wang-drp). 
 
As to SDT, we’d like to support both push mode and pull mode while DECADE Client gets data object from its DECADE Server. If so, subscription mode has to be introduced
in DECADE. 
 
Do you think it’s necessary to include both these two modes or just pull mode is enough? We’re looking forward to your opinions and comments.
 
Thanks!
 
Best wishes,
Danhua