Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency index

Art Berggreen <art@opal.acc.com> Fri, 21 August 1992 20:00 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06976; 21 Aug 92 16:00 EDT
Received: from NRI.NRI.Reston.Va.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06972; 21 Aug 92 16:00 EDT
Received: from inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15817; 21 Aug 92 16:01 EDT
Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA00293; Fri, 21 Aug 92 13:01:04 -0700
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA22160; Fri, 21 Aug 92 12:18:28 -0700
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA22156; Fri, 21 Aug 92 12:18:26 -0700
Received: by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com; id AA16262; Fri, 21 Aug 92 12:18:25 -0700
Received: by opal.acc.com (4.1/SMI-4.0)id AA17527; Fri, 21 Aug 92 12:20:02 PDT
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 92 12:20:02 PDT
From: Art Berggreen <art@opal.acc.com>
Message-Id: <9208211920.AA17527@opal.acc.com>
To: phiv-mib@pa.dec.com
Subject: Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency index

>
>I believe the following will make everyone happy:

I can live with it.

Art