Re: Adjacency index

saperia@tcpjon.ogo.dec.com Tue, 15 September 1992 15:20 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17132; 15 Sep 92 11:20 EDT
Received: from NRI.NRI.Reston.Va.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17128; 15 Sep 92 11:20 EDT
Received: from inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05866; 15 Sep 92 11:24 EDT
Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA22176; Tue, 15 Sep 92 08:23:40 -0700
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA02550; Tue, 15 Sep 92 08:07:36 -0700
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA02546; Tue, 15 Sep 92 08:07:34 -0700
Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA21433; Tue, 15 Sep 92 08:07:33 -0700
Received: by tcpjon.ogo.dec.com (5.57/ULTRIX-fma-071891); id AA02321; Tue, 15 Sep 92 11:10:21 -0400
Message-Id: <9209151510.AA02321@tcpjon.ogo.dec.com>
To: Debasis Dalapati <deb@tci.bell-atl.com>
Cc: saperia@tcpjon.ogo.dec.com, phiv-mib@pa.dec.com
Subject: Re: Adjacency index
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 28 Aug 92 17:55:15 EDT." <9208282155.AA24524@tci.bell-atl.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 11:10:20 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US
From: saperia@tcpjon.ogo.dec.com
X-Mts: smtp

Debasis:

You sent out a note a couple of weeks ago after we finished with the Adjacency
stuff about removing an object from the newly created table.  I do not remember
the discussion we had about this so I am posting your comment below to the
list.  If you can get a group of people to agree, I will remove whichever one
the group wants.  If you have a preference please let me know.
Thanks for all the help

/jon



>>Some time back, I asked a question about phivAdjListenTimer and 
>>phivAdjExecListenTimer and my understanding was that phivAdjExecListenTimer
>>could be dropped from the table. Well, there is no harm in keeping it, except
>>myself (and others) could avoid explaning it. :) Just reminding. 

>>debasis