Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency
Debasis Dalapati <deb@tci.bell-atl.com> Mon, 24 August 1992 14:59 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09094; 24 Aug 92 10:59 EDT
Received: from NRI.NRI.Reston.Va.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09090; 24 Aug 92 10:59 EDT
Received: from inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11829; 24 Aug 92 11:01 EDT
Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA10194; Mon, 24 Aug 92 08:00:31 -0700
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA09096; Mon, 24 Aug 92 07:00:44 -0700
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA09092; Mon, 24 Aug 92 07:00:43 -0700
Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA06960; Mon, 24 Aug 92 07:00:42 -0700
Received: by bagate.BELL-ATL.COM (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.29)id <m0mMezr-0000aTC@bagate.BELL-ATL.COM>; Mon, 24 Aug 92 10:02 EDT
Received: by tci.bell-atl.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA15515; Mon, 24 Aug 92 09:41:39 EDT
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1992 09:41:39 -0400
From: Debasis Dalapati <deb@tci.bell-atl.com>
Message-Id: <9208241341.AA15515@tci.bell-atl.com>
To: phiv-mib@pa.dec.com
Subject: Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency
>> >>jas@proteon.com (John A. Shriver) wrote: >> >>Hmm, as I look at it harder, I start to agree (much as I don't want to >>be the person implenting it) that the INDEX should be >>{phivAdjNodeAddr, phivAdjCircuitIndex}. It won't be the first table >>to have node addresses as indices. > >art@opal.acc.com (Art Berggreen) wrote: > >If we go this route, I'd just ask to swap the order to: > { phivAdjCircuitIndex, phivAdjNodeAddr } > >so that all of the adjacencies on a circuit will group together during a >table walk. > Art, I have the same proposal as you have. Having { phivAdjCircuitIndex, phivAdjNodeAddr } as the INDEX will be useful in finding all the adjacencies through a circuit. debasis
- Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency Debasis Dalapati
- Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency Debasis Dalapati
- DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency John A. Shriver
- Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency Art Berggreen
- Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency Debasis Dalapati
- Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency --the fi… saperia
- Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency saperia
- Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency Phil Budne
- Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency saperia
- Re: DECnet MIB question (3) -- adjacency David Perkins