Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] DP DT solution draft slides for IETF99

["Korhonen, Jouni" <[e-mail]>]

An update.. I am still doing the QoS etc part of the deck.


- Jouni



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Balázs Varga A [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 12:54 PM
> To: Korhonen, Jouni <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: DP DT solution draft slides for IETF99
> 
> Hi Jouni,
> 
> Thanks for preparing this. Just some fast reactions:
> - slide5-6-7: we may receive a comment that it looks like only end-hosts
> having same type (TSN, MPLS, IPv6) can be interconnected.
> I would propose to add a note, that other combinations as depicted
> requires further considerations.
> 
> - slide8: we have used the MS-PW analogy during our discussions. However
> it is valid only if PREF is used.
> I would propose to refer on the first bullet only to "PseudoWires" and
> "IPv6" as the two data plane solution.
> A further note could highlight the MS-PW analogy for PREF scenarios.
> 
> - slide10-11: I would pair the DetNet flow specific information fields to
> be transported with the data plane encapsulation fields.
> 	DetNet flow	Encapsulation fields
> 	Flow ID:	PW label
> 	Seq. number: 	CW
> 
> - slide14: regarding multicast DetNet flows I would formulate somewhat
> different. In my view we have considered p2p data plane solutions.
> The defined data plane works for DetNet flows having multicast dst-address
> assuming that the DetNet domain provides p2p connectivity.
> We may also receive comments that many DetNet flows are multicast (e.g.,
> TSN flows using IEEE-FRER, etc.)
> 
> Cheers
> Bala'zs
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
> Korhonen, Jouni
> Sent: 2017. július 12. 23:29
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: [Detnet-dp-dt] DP DT solution draft slides for IETF99
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Sorry about this taking so long. Please, have a look and flame on..
> There's still time to work on the actual content. However, keep in mind
> that this is mainly an update from last time.
> 
> - Jouni