Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] DP DT solution draft slides for IETF99

"Korhonen, Jouni" <Jouni.Korhonen@nordicsemi.no> Thu, 13 July 2017 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <Jouni.Korhonen@nordicsemi.no>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D30129B61 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oWBw1BP-1dln for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ironport01.nordicsemi.no (mail.nordicsemi.no [194.19.86.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975CD131A80 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,354,1496095200"; d="xml'?pptx'72,48?emf'72,48?scan'72,48,208,145,72,48?rels'72,48,208,145,72,48?jpeg'72,48,208,145,72,48,145"; a="7349122"
From: "Korhonen, Jouni" <Jouni.Korhonen@nordicsemi.no>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bal=E1zs_Varga_A?= <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>, "detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org" <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: DP DT solution draft slides for IETF99
Thread-Index: AdL7VbJhRw14DqiURNu5NaedHIODigAZSslQAAk8ghA=
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 13:57:09 +0000
Message-ID: <d7377e8b99b249c6ad852854225999b3@nordicsemi.no>
References: <c815dbfd9d574366aa7775976fe24bce@nordicsemi.no> <DBXPR07MB128CD2139DFCC357D03F8A6ACAC0@DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DBXPR07MB128CD2139DFCC357D03F8A6ACAC0@DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.9.200.83]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_d7377e8b99b249c6ad852854225999b3nordicsemino_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/-nq4ZBKbmhsquAiE0bo95IC7IO4>
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] DP DT solution draft slides for IETF99
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 13:57:23 -0000

An update.. I am still doing the QoS etc part of the deck.


- Jouni



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Balázs Varga A [mailto:balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 12:54 PM
> To: Korhonen, Jouni <Jouni.Korhonen@nordicsemi.no>no>; detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: DP DT solution draft slides for IETF99
> 
> Hi Jouni,
> 
> Thanks for preparing this. Just some fast reactions:
> - slide5-6-7: we may receive a comment that it looks like only end-hosts
> having same type (TSN, MPLS, IPv6) can be interconnected.
> I would propose to add a note, that other combinations as depicted
> requires further considerations.
> 
> - slide8: we have used the MS-PW analogy during our discussions. However
> it is valid only if PREF is used.
> I would propose to refer on the first bullet only to "PseudoWires" and
> "IPv6" as the two data plane solution.
> A further note could highlight the MS-PW analogy for PREF scenarios.
> 
> - slide10-11: I would pair the DetNet flow specific information fields to
> be transported with the data plane encapsulation fields.
> 	DetNet flow	Encapsulation fields
> 	Flow ID:	PW label
> 	Seq. number: 	CW
> 
> - slide14: regarding multicast DetNet flows I would formulate somewhat
> different. In my view we have considered p2p data plane solutions.
> The defined data plane works for DetNet flows having multicast dst-address
> assuming that the DetNet domain provides p2p connectivity.
> We may also receive comments that many DetNet flows are multicast (e.g.,
> TSN flows using IEEE-FRER, etc.)
> 
> Cheers
> Bala'zs
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:detnet-dp-dt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Korhonen, Jouni
> Sent: 2017. július 12. 23:29
> To: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> Subject: [Detnet-dp-dt] DP DT solution draft slides for IETF99
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Sorry about this taking so long. Please, have a look and flame on..
> There's still time to work on the actual content. However, keep in mind
> that this is mainly an update from last time.
> 
> - Jouni