IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] high level questions on detnet dataplane

"jouni.nospam" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Wed, 22 February 2017 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82C7129A38; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 07:52:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xqKKqQVU9dDL; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 07:52:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x244.google.com (mail-qk0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F8D6129A37; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 07:52:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x244.google.com with SMTP id x71so991023qkb.0; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 07:52:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=DlHl2/VTihTgKfWEc2xBg+S+11RYpOYzkdD5Ju75IC8=; b=deJGpsidl6hV9+dlvdySgDoTRlzk5FlxlTZN0PnaLHhUXYz2R7gmClbbinXJ6AKEZk hAAD8DUOo8WfDUMarqllK4CjUSbhsff3xsZk+oa0DCr/wr/KliKNWA5Lhq1JnNN55HgW Ef6O/f0EUeLwHjeHl5YOou4NQxJV2wwkv9USXlutd60PUs1TgqWs8Wb9BI5OuNvgxwOo hOsxy8RTbiw3AZjn3C5tvcgFY84O1NWadamSSruiO9QBnRD30v1jtmdZkGih8sG30N1e PUjSHCO5Pny3CuImMTtnFHeEih4oB9H61WdgjDbpDe5ucT2Jcm58RfypE/q6h9Ki7Uoe FPYA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=DlHl2/VTihTgKfWEc2xBg+S+11RYpOYzkdD5Ju75IC8=; b=Q+c269LSzesO4K58XQ/6TC6YDYg+GDpzo0XP/D0KlxoGLr9CeZEp7qsmj+SbpN3ASo T916GtJr8/XWlEaWkJu7WGiVhrQaq5PgrwQXM/5C03dy9swKyb4t1DnFFJauP9RJKgiw EEY+tjvFYoPEoKuZ4JfjjnrSWxJ6CE10fMm7VmRNtJPEWYEHS69wrdl0Gsi0JDG9aP1x Tu0WAEf1YA+30MT9mPRdPphDM1/oap1Uu+Q4Wt8OlSe0gkXPi+Difhwge8epQbxlOBwo IbMYUnTHtaZyJUO1zys8I4nGJ2m5jXTDiJuCOFWqFc3oyoyqFEptPb/0OXgndseM+p3g tbnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39n8hYco1VdV5phMGuRwgbZ6KqmuZeGEYH+058hUIPo02iqsFKAli8J+5yIfCQ6cbQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.79.8 with SMTP id d8mr2829384qkb.50.1487778719344; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 07:51:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.89.94] ([216.31.219.19]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 21sm918222qkh.14.2017.02.22.07.51.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 07:51:58 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: "jouni.nospam" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1487778303.2981.36.camel@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 07:51:55 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B15E88B4-1697-4381-AB96-53FF3843EC72@gmail.com>
References: <DBXPR07MB12832861ED58D86FD3D0A09AC510@DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <F278A381-1E43-4607-8015-5CFDE871D382@broadcom.com> <DBXPR07MB1287715CE1D6AA6B6CC932DAC500@DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <1645a73b-0260-327f-c45b-8bb084235689@pi.nu> <1487762243.2981.16.camel@it.uc3m.es> <F682D087-1E21-41A3-9103-2B871A5C3039@gmail.com> <1487778303.2981.36.camel@it.uc3m.es>
To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/03b5gporgctwKO1Hkls5vDd_Gho>
Cc: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] high level questions on detnet dataplane
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:52:02 -0000

Hi Carlos,

[snip]

> On Feb 22, 2017, at 7:45 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> wrote:
> Hi Jouni,
> On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 07:26 -0800, jouni.nospam wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>>> On Feb 22, 2017, at 3:17 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.u
>>> c3m.es> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Loa,
>>> 
>>> On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 18:32 +0800, Loa Andersson wrote:
>>>> Folks,
>> 
>>> I have also another question: are we considering somehow the
>>> requirements that some detnet applications (e.g., crosshauling)
>>> might
>>> require bidirectional flows to be symmetric?
>> 
>> There are already mechanisms that you can use to create bidirectional
>> tunnels at the transport network level. How the control plane comes 
> 
> OK. So, I guess we should document in the draft for example
> considerations when using MPLS to keep in mind to ensure that paths are
> symmetrical (if the detnet app needs that), right?

Sure. I welcome contributions for the needed text.

- Jouni


> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Carlos

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email