[Detnet-dp-dt] LFIB proposals
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Tue, 28 February 2017 14:35 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89254129528
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 06:35:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 1GKFn-XMBEOP for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 28 Feb 2017 06:35:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141])
(using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB8CB1295AD
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 06:35:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [119.95.38.221])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu)
by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C17B18014F3
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:35:21 +0100 (CET)
To: "detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org" <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <2c2d99cb-5e12-2328-a7f2-07bde1bfdef0@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 22:35:17 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------C230187CD753E594566F88E6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/08DlzfQGgh8s7hMT3P5rSgEvuQc>
Subject: [Detnet-dp-dt] LFIB proposals
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>,
<mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>,
<mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:35:30 -0000
Folks, I talked Yuanlong earlier today, and we agreed do work a bit on "each others slides and texts". Yuanlong agreed to do the label stacks for "my slide 7" and I agreed convert "my slide 7" to an LFIB. That text is included. Given what I said earlier there needs to be some (a lot of) proof reading done, b ut I think the idea is clear. One odd thing is that I've been going towards that we don't need the L-level labels, when doing the LFIB I'm less convinced that we can do without them. It turns out that what Stewart Bryant has been talking about over the last year "MPLS labels as instructions", L-labels are (among other things) an instruction to do or not to do replication/ elimination. Sorry I've not had time to look at multicast. /Loa -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [Detnet-dp-dt] LFIB proposals Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] LFIB proposals Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] LFIB proposals Jiangyuanlong