[Detnet-dp-dt] Updates to dp-sol
Norman Finn <norman.finn@mail01.huawei.com> Fri, 26 May 2017 23:58 UTC
Return-Path: <norman.finn@mail01.huawei.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34382129B33
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 May 2017 16:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id TSJOeb_6prLc for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 26 May 2017 16:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrg12-dlp.huawei.com (dfwrg12-dlp.huawei.com [206.16.17.16])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C682F129B1A
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 May 2017 16:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfwpml703-chm.exmail.huawei.com)
([172.18.9.243])
by dfwrg12-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued)
with ESMTP id BCD61494; Fri, 26 May 2017 18:58:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from DFWPML702-CHM.exmail.huawei.com ([169.254.5.112]) by
dfwpml703-chm.exmail.huawei.com ([10.124.31.135]) with mapi id
14.03.0301.000; Fri, 26 May 2017 16:57:59 -0700
From: Norman Finn <norman.finn@mail01.huawei.com>
To: "detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org" <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Updates to dp-sol
Thread-Index: AdLWe+ZNrEwhMukURuyl8l+vnLNXDg==
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 23:57:58 +0000
Message-ID: <3DF0466E9510274382F5B74499ACD6F8C75E1E@dfwpml702-chm.exmail.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.18.4.35]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_3DF0466E9510274382F5B74499ACD6F8C75E1Edfwpml702chmexmai_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/0xNoAzSXPYjLPgAHt5HnwssyHQE>
Subject: [Detnet-dp-dt] Updates to dp-sol
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>,
<mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>,
<mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 23:58:06 -0000
I've checked in an updated draft-dt-detnet-dp-sol-01. Changes: - Fixed a few typos/spelling. - Expanded introduction to include IPv6 encaps. - Edited time section. It assumed that PTP is normally a DetNet flow, and I claim that that is not the normal case, at all. Also, the first choice (now the second) needed a little clarification. - Added sentence in bidirectional about no special bidirectional feature except for same path. - Small edit to Class of Service. - Added 7.6 Layer 2 addressing considerations. - Added 802.1Q to references. - Added myself to authors list. All of the above are, IMO, covered by what we talked about on Tuesday except maybe the introduction (which should be non-controversial) and the synchronization stuff (which could conceivably be controversial). Feel free to challenge what you don't like, of course. -- Norm
- [Detnet-dp-dt] Updates to dp-sol Norman Finn
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Updates to dp-sol Balázs Varga A
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Updates to dp-sol jouni korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Updates to dp-sol Balázs Varga A