Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] an attempt on math for global pools of labels

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Wed, 22 February 2017 12:00 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613BE129713 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 04:00:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8uLmU4S8Aw11 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 04:00:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2CB012970F for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 04:00:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [122.52.25.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B10018013BE for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:00:32 +0100 (CET)
To: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
References: <d3c06c89-daee-9a8f-c6d9-24e125f8adac@pi.nu> <1487763696.2981.23.camel@it.uc3m.es> <7cd45c4b-0760-ef3a-0a28-71602764fe72@pi.nu> <1487764468.2981.25.camel@it.uc3m.es>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <a224ccd3-6a15-c75b-7f45-9301c3960e9b@pi.nu>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 20:00:28 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1487764468.2981.25.camel@it.uc3m.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/1MUDUL2go-YgZMKpBFVRwBnNVp0>
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] an attempt on math for global pools of labels
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:00:39 -0000

Carlos,

The distribution of the poll will be relatively static, even if one node
is operating in saturation, the limited availability of labels will
cause problem for that node.

/Loa

On 2017-02-22 19:54, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote:
> Hi Loa,
>
> On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 19:46 +0800, Loa Andersson wrote:
>> Yes,  it is true that it is rough, but normally I want a scaling
>> factor
>> of at least 10 (or more).
>
> Sure, fully agree. But you can also assume that all edge network nodes
> will not be operating in saturation mode all the time, no?
>
> Carlos
>
>>
>> /Loa
>>
>> On 2017-02-22 19:41, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote:
>>> Hi Loa,
>>>
>>> I agree it is worth doing this kind of rough estimate. I guess we
>>> need
>>> also some insights from use cases to do a better estimate.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 18:59 +0800, Loa Andersson wrote:
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> Figures are not scientific, just off the top of my head.
>>>>
>>>> Assume that we have 400 edge nodes and the receiving and sending
>>>> capability of each node is 2400 G and the average DetNet flow is
>>>> 1G,
>>>> and the traffic matrix is close to even.
>>>>
>>>> This means that each node will need 2400 Labels to manage as a
>>>> pool
>>>> for
>>>> the d-pw labels if we go with the idea to make them unique for
>>>> the
>>>> entire domain. 400 * 2400 = 960 000 which brings us close to
>>>> exhausting
>>>> the label space.
>>>
>>> So you assume that all edge nodes are saturated, right? Is this a
>>> reasonable assumption? I have some doubts, but this is just a
>>> personal
>>> feeling.
>>>
>>> And, what do we assume of the inner topology/nodes capacities?
>>> because
>>> unless the topology is really meshed, that number of flows would
>>> generate an aggregated throughput (especially considering that some
>>> nodes will be doing replication of packets) in some nodes that is
>>> probably higher than what the links can support, no?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Carlos
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I real life I don't think that the average speed is as high as
>>>> 1G, if
>>>> it
>>>> were "only" 500 M, the label space would be exhausted.
>>>>
>>>> /Loa
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
> Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt
>

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64