Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] an attempt on math for global pools of labels
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Wed, 22 February 2017 12:00 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613BE129713
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 04:00:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 8uLmU4S8Aw11 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 22 Feb 2017 04:00:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141])
(using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2CB012970F
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 04:00:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [122.52.25.23])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu)
by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B10018013BE
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:00:32 +0100 (CET)
To: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
References: <d3c06c89-daee-9a8f-c6d9-24e125f8adac@pi.nu>
<1487763696.2981.23.camel@it.uc3m.es>
<7cd45c4b-0760-ef3a-0a28-71602764fe72@pi.nu>
<1487764468.2981.25.camel@it.uc3m.es>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <a224ccd3-6a15-c75b-7f45-9301c3960e9b@pi.nu>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 20:00:28 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1487764468.2981.25.camel@it.uc3m.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/1MUDUL2go-YgZMKpBFVRwBnNVp0>
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] an attempt on math for global pools of labels
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>,
<mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>,
<mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:00:39 -0000
Carlos, The distribution of the poll will be relatively static, even if one node is operating in saturation, the limited availability of labels will cause problem for that node. /Loa On 2017-02-22 19:54, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote: > Hi Loa, > > On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 19:46 +0800, Loa Andersson wrote: >> Yes, it is true that it is rough, but normally I want a scaling >> factor >> of at least 10 (or more). > > Sure, fully agree. But you can also assume that all edge network nodes > will not be operating in saturation mode all the time, no? > > Carlos > >> >> /Loa >> >> On 2017-02-22 19:41, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote: >>> Hi Loa, >>> >>> I agree it is worth doing this kind of rough estimate. I guess we >>> need >>> also some insights from use cases to do a better estimate. >>> >>> On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 18:59 +0800, Loa Andersson wrote: >>>> Folks, >>>> >>>> Figures are not scientific, just off the top of my head. >>>> >>>> Assume that we have 400 edge nodes and the receiving and sending >>>> capability of each node is 2400 G and the average DetNet flow is >>>> 1G, >>>> and the traffic matrix is close to even. >>>> >>>> This means that each node will need 2400 Labels to manage as a >>>> pool >>>> for >>>> the d-pw labels if we go with the idea to make them unique for >>>> the >>>> entire domain. 400 * 2400 = 960 000 which brings us close to >>>> exhausting >>>> the label space. >>> >>> So you assume that all edge nodes are saturated, right? Is this a >>> reasonable assumption? I have some doubts, but this is just a >>> personal >>> feeling. >>> >>> And, what do we assume of the inner topology/nodes capacities? >>> because >>> unless the topology is really meshed, that number of flows would >>> generate an aggregated throughput (especially considering that some >>> nodes will be doing replication of packets) in some nodes that is >>> probably higher than what the links can support, no? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Carlos >>> >>>> >>>> I real life I don't think that the average speed is as high as >>>> 1G, if >>>> it >>>> were "only" 500 M, the label space would be exhausted. >>>> >>>> /Loa >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Detnet-dp-dt mailing list > Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt > -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [Detnet-dp-dt] an attempt on math for global pool… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] an attempt on math for global … Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] an attempt on math for global … Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] an attempt on math for global … Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] an attempt on math for global … Loa Andersson