IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com> Sat, 11 March 2017 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E43A129574 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:35:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4iHfPLPmRGJf for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:35:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22a.google.com (mail-pg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94DF7126FDC for <Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:35:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id b129so50218553pgc.2 for <Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:35:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=6EGWytOWjgVtBnxYvadmBUmYyc8KkjnvKfx2K7CbXLo=; b=JPIbQ8lEZlE9bpurdtOBjD/3inqvBw1EIXJRWcFBuBOQBfHSTXMDEPcYpeBDcbK3jD 4MdRN881CCENVzoAgkiZCdWaKWLvCFj+wh1NrB1KbiTWGu/3c6uMV5lghsOSG1vPCoi+ S5PqNqLGdlgwQ/3nj+3nPGT2h9bCjbVz9lfwg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=6EGWytOWjgVtBnxYvadmBUmYyc8KkjnvKfx2K7CbXLo=; b=LGm6rjElXTXMORhbt/xj+PCus/9QEqG4ygz/Lh4Z9g0XzlKOBTYz8bMi0IyDoECI/c GwquiBz1yuCESHgGx33SKKNB8fvG9fDfIcvZtM4QRFsGcTZdKpftFte5dZ0ohBlrA6P7 LDf2ELvV39oTAjttxordGtD5Isz1gsx81XpzhZYhXUsrr9frsghQb8x0xIOQGofFCcGH phZaiEARFStcTibesZEGv0qBVnT1BEtDBjtAy92Jy4MAHZFQ/S8LUkkH/96wMBxDWpuC QBHobYLPc4pnCeMs6sMDSpCywVaAs+7TZkiVRfixwNybteo1RlXPWZU9i3nlQi1xVn6e xI+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mCAoVoSsTavAPdjjsUsWJdcsm0N88tt7tExWoE+N1kcjSNnSRpigsgpMUhMhVR6Yag
X-Received: by 10.99.9.65 with SMTP id 62mr27738933pgj.22.1489260901964; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:35:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4200:e520:cdc9:ae40:bbe0:e02d? ([2601:647:4200:e520:cdc9:ae40:bbe0:e02d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i15sm25543064pfj.0.2017.03.11.11.35.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:35:01 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68BBAB1B250@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:35:00 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B73B333C-A47B-4119-9E46-57CF9CC04C0F@broadcom.com>
References: <88BD4A49-3A2C-44DD-A090-E7A3AAC8BF61@broadcom.com> <3eaa6ced-1493-a0da-125f-694567de0107@ericsson.com> <EEF82160-BCA3-4C22-8C81-4D76EC8B9BDB@broadcom.com> <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68BBAB1B250@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com>
To: Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/2I-BkX-99Bm6Zb5gysJgURAf4nM>
Cc: Janos Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com>, "Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org" <Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 19:35:04 -0000

FREF has been now replaced by PREF in the document.

- Jouni


-- 
Jouni Korhonen, Broadcom, Core Switching Group
+1-408-391-7160



> On Mar 11, 2017, at 4:35 AM, Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> "Packet Replication and Elimination for Redundancy" (PRER) , it seems PRER makes more sense in MPLS than FRER.
> 
> Cheers,
> Yuanlong
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:detnet-dp-dt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen
> Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2017 4:23 AM
> To: Janos Farkas
> Cc: Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>> On Mar 10, 2017, at 10:01 AM, János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jouni,
>> 
>> I've made some changes to the draft. The attached pdf indicates them.
>> I've updated the xml version where you moved Balazs' text to be main text. I hope i did not mess xml versioning.
>> (the commented pdf is one version earlier)
> 
> Nope. I rebased my ongoing edits to yours so everything is fine. Nothing git cannot do ;)
> 
> 
>> Well, I did not make any dramatic change.
>> I'd highlight two:
>> a) replaced "data plane protocol" with "data plane solution". We are working on solution as reflected by "sol" in the file name ;-). I mean, a protocol is rather above the data plane, e.g., in the control plane.
>> b) replaced "domain" with alternatives. DetNet is for single domain. Actually, domain is an overloaded term: administrative domain, etc., better to avoid.
> 
> Ack.
> 
>> I highlighted one thing in the pdw, which I did not implement in the xml:
>> "frame replication and elimination"
>> The architecture document uses "packet replication and elimination", which I think would be better to be used in this doc too; except for he cases when we explicitly refer to 802.1CB.
>> This appears multiple places, another variant: ""frame replication and duplicate elimination".
>> If there is agreement then we could make the change.
> 
> Let’s go for the arch doc way. So “Packet Replication and Elimination for Redundancy” (PREF) ?
> 
> - Jouni
> 
> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Janos
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/10/2017 5:55 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>> 
>>> I did quite a bit of updates to the draft. All in GitHub. I’ll continue writing over the weekend etc..
>>> 
>>> - Jouni
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> <draft-dt-detnet-dp-sol-00 - 2017-03-10-JF-comments.pdf>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
> Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email