Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Sat, 11 March 2017 12:48 UTC
Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D891A1294ED
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:48:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.099
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001,
RCVD_IN_PSBL=2.7, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key)
header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id JXE25J0eRXCB for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:48:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com
(gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.39.168])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B4A001294EB
for <Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:48:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 9265 invoked by uid 0); 11 Mar 2017 12:48:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82)
by gproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 2017 12:48:47 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with
id ucoj1u00D2SSUrH01com8s; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 05:48:47 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Ath9goNP c=1 sm=1 tr=0
a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17
a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10
a=6Iz7jQTuP9IA:10 a=i0EeH86SAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=0FD05c-RAAAA:8
a=ygzDmGGAXz0uVArh8BsA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=02toJ7V-nxh73JlV0Smw:22
a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22 a=l1rpMCqCXRGZwUSuRcM3:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net;
s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:
References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:CC:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:
Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
bh=AxOzfdQN7MlwZGVzhg/FmYQe5BjW1+FDpjzsjSfJjU0=; b=otv3DrqZVFaBSkAk6nz+HKobcC
qA6oqYMpnubVkXfZcN/TWs1+kQT5vWGo09ly2mMmlGibu8RC+Jd8T/k2HzeNsBuRMILyuh4EdNeUN
TGVQsNpb/6axsmuWfcT6eQI3m;
Received: from pool-100-15-85-191.washdc.fios.verizon.net
([100.15.85.191]:39956 helo=[11.4.0.163])
by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>)
id 1cmgRv-0002Nf-0C; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 05:48:43 -0700
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
To: Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>,
Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>,
Janos Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:48:40 -0500
Message-ID: <15abd69ec40.27d3.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68BBAB1B250@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <88BD4A49-3A2C-44DD-A090-E7A3AAC8BF61@broadcom.com>
<3eaa6ced-1493-a0da-125f-694567de0107@ericsson.com>
<EEF82160-BCA3-4C22-8C81-4D76EC8B9BDB@broadcom.com>
<3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68BBAB1B250@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com>
User-Agent: AquaMail/1.8.1-193 (build: 100800100)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.85.191
X-Exim-ID: 1cmgRv-0002Nf-0C
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-85-191.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([11.4.0.163])
[100.15.85.191]:39956
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 5
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/2M7ot_O9Ki2NXNo8sji3uvELX1s>
Cc: Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>,
<mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>,
<mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:48:52 -0000
I think you mean from the PW perspective. From the MPLS and provider transport perspective, it's 1+1 protection... On March 11, 2017 7:36:02 AM Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com> wrote: > "Packet Replication and Elimination for Redundancy" (PRER) , it seems PRER > makes more sense in MPLS than FRER. > > Cheers, > Yuanlong > > -----Original Message----- > From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:detnet-dp-dt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Jouni Korhonen > Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2017 4:23 AM > To: Janos Farkas > Cc: Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github > > Thanks. > >> On Mar 10, 2017, at 10:01 AM, János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Jouni, >> >> I've made some changes to the draft. The attached pdf indicates them. >> I've updated the xml version where you moved Balazs' text to be main text. >> I hope i did not mess xml versioning. >> (the commented pdf is one version earlier) > > Nope. I rebased my ongoing edits to yours so everything is fine. Nothing > git cannot do ;) > > >> Well, I did not make any dramatic change. >> I'd highlight two: >> a) replaced "data plane protocol" with "data plane solution". We are >> working on solution as reflected by "sol" in the file name ;-). I mean, a >> protocol is rather above the data plane, e.g., in the control plane. >> b) replaced "domain" with alternatives. DetNet is for single domain. >> Actually, domain is an overloaded term: administrative domain, etc., better >> to avoid. > > Ack. > >> I highlighted one thing in the pdw, which I did not implement in the xml: >> "frame replication and elimination" >> The architecture document uses "packet replication and elimination", which >> I think would be better to be used in this doc too; except for he cases >> when we explicitly refer to 802.1CB. >> This appears multiple places, another variant: ""frame replication and >> duplicate elimination". >> If there is agreement then we could make the change. > > Let’s go for the arch doc way. So “Packet Replication and Elimination for > Redundancy” (PREF) ? > > - Jouni > > >> >> Regards, >> Janos >> >> >> On 3/10/2017 5:55 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: >>> Folks, >>> >>> I did quite a bit of updates to the draft. All in GitHub. I’ll continue >>> writing over the weekend etc.. >>> >>> - Jouni >>> >>> >> >> <draft-dt-detnet-dp-sol-00 - 2017-03-10-JF-comments.pdf> > > _______________________________________________ > Detnet-dp-dt mailing list > Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt > _______________________________________________ > Detnet-dp-dt mailing list > Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt
- [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github Loa Andersson
- [Detnet-dp-dt] One more comment - Re: Draft updat… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] One more comment - Re: Draft u… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] One more comment - Re: Draft u… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github Balázs Varga A
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github János Farkas
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github Jiangyuanlong
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github Lou Berger
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github János Farkas
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github János Farkas
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github János Farkas
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano