Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Sat, 11 March 2017 12:48 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D891A1294ED for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:48:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.099
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_PSBL=2.7, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JXE25J0eRXCB for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:48:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.39.168]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B4A001294EB for <Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:48:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 9265 invoked by uid 0); 11 Mar 2017 12:48:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 2017 12:48:47 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id ucoj1u00D2SSUrH01com8s; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 05:48:47 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Ath9goNP c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=6Iz7jQTuP9IA:10 a=i0EeH86SAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=0FD05c-RAAAA:8 a=ygzDmGGAXz0uVArh8BsA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=02toJ7V-nxh73JlV0Smw:22 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22 a=l1rpMCqCXRGZwUSuRcM3:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:CC:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=AxOzfdQN7MlwZGVzhg/FmYQe5BjW1+FDpjzsjSfJjU0=; b=otv3DrqZVFaBSkAk6nz+HKobcC qA6oqYMpnubVkXfZcN/TWs1+kQT5vWGo09ly2mMmlGibu8RC+Jd8T/k2HzeNsBuRMILyuh4EdNeUN TGVQsNpb/6axsmuWfcT6eQI3m;
Received: from pool-100-15-85-191.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.85.191]:39956 helo=[11.4.0.163]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1cmgRv-0002Nf-0C; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 05:48:43 -0700
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
To: Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>, Janos Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:48:40 -0500
Message-ID: <15abd69ec40.27d3.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68BBAB1B250@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <88BD4A49-3A2C-44DD-A090-E7A3AAC8BF61@broadcom.com> <3eaa6ced-1493-a0da-125f-694567de0107@ericsson.com> <EEF82160-BCA3-4C22-8C81-4D76EC8B9BDB@broadcom.com> <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68BBAB1B250@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com>
User-Agent: AquaMail/1.8.1-193 (build: 100800100)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.85.191
X-Exim-ID: 1cmgRv-0002Nf-0C
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-85-191.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([11.4.0.163]) [100.15.85.191]:39956
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 5
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/2M7ot_O9Ki2NXNo8sji3uvELX1s>
Cc: Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:48:52 -0000

I think you mean from the PW perspective. From the MPLS and provider 
transport perspective, it's  1+1 protection...


On March 11, 2017 7:36:02 AM Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com> wrote:

> "Packet Replication and Elimination for Redundancy" (PRER) , it seems PRER 
> makes more sense in MPLS than FRER.
>
> Cheers,
> Yuanlong
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:detnet-dp-dt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
> Jouni Korhonen
> Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2017 4:23 AM
> To: Janos Farkas
> Cc: Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github
>
> Thanks.
>
>> On Mar 10, 2017, at 10:01 AM, János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jouni,
>>
>> I've made some changes to the draft. The attached pdf indicates them.
>> I've updated the xml version where you moved Balazs' text to be main text. 
>> I hope i did not mess xml versioning.
>> (the commented pdf is one version earlier)
>
> Nope. I rebased my ongoing edits to yours so everything is fine. Nothing 
> git cannot do ;)
>
>
>> Well, I did not make any dramatic change.
>> I'd highlight two:
>> a) replaced "data plane protocol" with "data plane solution". We are 
>> working on solution as reflected by "sol" in the file name ;-). I mean, a 
>> protocol is rather above the data plane, e.g., in the control plane.
>> b) replaced "domain" with alternatives. DetNet is for single domain. 
>> Actually, domain is an overloaded term: administrative domain, etc., better 
>> to avoid.
>
> Ack.
>
>> I highlighted one thing in the pdw, which I did not implement in the xml:
>> "frame replication and elimination"
>> The architecture document uses "packet replication and elimination", which 
>> I think would be better to be used in this doc too; except for he cases 
>> when we explicitly refer to 802.1CB.
>> This appears multiple places, another variant: ""frame replication and 
>> duplicate elimination".
>> If there is agreement then we could make the change.
>
> Let’s go for the arch doc way. So “Packet Replication and Elimination for 
> Redundancy” (PREF) ?
>
> - Jouni
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Janos
>>
>>
>> On 3/10/2017 5:55 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I did quite a bit of updates to the draft. All in GitHub. I’ll continue 
>>> writing over the weekend etc..
>>>
>>> - Jouni
>>>
>>>
>>
>> <draft-dt-detnet-dp-sol-00 - 2017-03-10-JF-comments.pdf>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
> Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt
> _______________________________________________
> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
> Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt