Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] DP DT solution draft slides for IETF99

[Jiangyuanlong <[e-mail]>]

Hi folks,

I am not sure we need to introduce S-Label in the first place. 
As I remember, we had some consensus that PW label has carried enough information in the f2f discussion happened during the last IETF meeting.
And S-label is regarded redundant for PW. Did I miss something?

Thanks,
Yuanlong

-----Original Message-----
From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Jouni
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 1:17 PM
To: [e-mail]; 'Korhonen, Jouni'; 'Balázs Varga A'; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] DP DT solution draft slides for IETF99

Thanks. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of 
> Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 20:39 PM
> To: Korhonen, Jouni <[e-mail]>; Balázs Varga A 
> <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] DP DT solution draft slides for IETF99
> 
> Hi Jouni,
> 
> Thanks for preparing this. Some small comments below:
> 
> - Slide 6: I'd remove "native" in "PW-based native DetNet" to be 
> consistent with the terms used in the draft (alternatively, I'd use 
> "IPv6- based native DetNet" in slide 7for consistency with "PW-based 
> native DetNet in slide 6).

Oops. Good catch.

> 
> - Slides 11 and 12: use the same order for "Flow-ID" and "SeqNum" on 
> the slides (right hand side)

Ok.

 
> - Slide 11: though I have no concrete proposal, I think the S-label 
> could be better introduced (maybe with a figure, also introducing the 
> (DA-)T-PE and (DA-)S-PE node terminology).

Ok. I'll come up with something.


> 
> - Slide 14: "already be seen" --> "already been seen"

Ok.

- Jouni



> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Carlos
> 
> On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 13:57 +0000, Korhonen, Jouni wrote:
> > An update.. I am still doing the QoS etc part of the deck.
> >
> >
> > - Jouni
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Balázs Varga A [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 12:54 PM
> > > To: Korhonen, Jouni <[e-mail]>; 
> > > detnet-dp-dt@ie tf.org
> > > Subject: RE: DP DT solution draft slides for IETF99
> > >
> > > Hi Jouni,
> > >
> > > Thanks for preparing this. Just some fast reactions:
> > > - slide5-6-7: we may receive a comment that it looks like only 
> > > end- hosts having same type (TSN, MPLS, IPv6) can be interconnected.
> > > I would propose to add a note, that other combinations as depicted 
> > > requires further considerations.
> > >
> > > - slide8: we have used the MS-PW analogy during our discussions.
> > > However
> > > it is valid only if PREF is used.
> > > I would propose to refer on the first bullet only to "PseudoWires"
> > > and
> > > "IPv6" as the two data plane solution.
> > > A further note could highlight the MS-PW analogy for PREF scenarios.
> > >
> > > - slide10-11: I would pair the DetNet flow specific information 
> > > fields to be transported with the data plane encapsulation fields.
> > > 	DetNet flow	Encapsulation fields
> > > 	Flow ID:	PW label
> > > 	Seq. number: 	CW
> > >
> > > - slide14: regarding multicast DetNet flows I would formulate 
> > > somewhat different. In my view we have considered p2p data plane 
> > > solutions.
> > > The defined data plane works for DetNet flows having multicast 
> > > dst- address assuming that the DetNet domain provides p2p connectivity.
> > > We may also receive comments that many DetNet flows are multicast 
> > > (e.g., TSN flows using IEEE-FRER, etc.)
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Bala'zs
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:[e-mail]] On 
> > > Behalf Of Korhonen, Jouni
> > > Sent: 2017. július 12. 23:29
> > > To: [e-mail]
> > > Subject: [Detnet-dp-dt] DP DT solution draft slides for IETF99
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Sorry about this taking so long. Please, have a look and flame on..
> > > There's still time to work on the actual content. However, keep in 
> > > mind that this is mainly an update from last time.
> > >
> > > - Jouni
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt

_______________________________________________
Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt