IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] merged Tal's text into the master branch

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 14 June 2017 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A9512EBC5 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 05:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JY__IN5tAboD for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 05:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.33.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EE1D12EBD0 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 05:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw3 (unknown [10.0.90.84]) by gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C1F1AB286 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 06:07:59 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw3 with id Yc7w1v0052SSUrH01c7zbE; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 06:07:59 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=VKStp5HX c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=LWSFodeU3zMA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=i0EeH86SAAAA:8 a=LaesKDrxU8-pGmollfQA:9 a=Ri4S7OZg9M3_J7R8:21 a=ToKKm4nElwKCWQTm:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22 a=6kGIvZw6iX1k4Y-7sg4_:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=l5X/f35HU4yFAyn6ykaKVk6o/SE/doI2v16QEhwdbVU=; b=q/LzP5b5e92OaNrrnEn6c70fwA 3eSJSR9AL1LB5jYllAJLzhPBM7DKfbcxuGKBWGVGHVAq28CUi6NRHaqOojcLWpkNFeXq2Ll8uV5IK OK9G1r7XLXRHYXXrH8fqZrwCh;
Received: from pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.84.20]:53184 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1dL75X-0002NL-UL; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 06:07:56 -0600
To: Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
References: <01e201d2e169$197b6aa0$4c723fe0$@gmail.com> <048f01d2e43e$359506b0$a0bf1410$@gmail.com> <7ab733e0-d226-c42c-8925-64f4f4fefe91@pi.nu> <051701d2e451$7ff6cb90$7fe462b0$@gmail.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <912f09a8-734c-86aa-495e-fce91907d648@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 08:07:52 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <051701d2e451$7ff6cb90$7fe462b0$@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.84.20
X-Exim-ID: 1dL75X-0002NL-UL
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.84.20]:53184
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 5
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/6xCKDTG5RYUsmt-wjnBHR34EewE>
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] merged Tal's text into the master branch
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 12:08:03 -0000

H,

I just did a quick skim of the document solely from the QoS
perspective.  The document seems a bit light in this area -- and leaves
it to the reader to infer how DetNet QoS is provided.  What are your
thoughts on this section?  (Address it in the future, haven't thought
about it, etc.)

I think at least saying that QoS is expected to be provided by the
underlying network layers, specifically TE LSPs in MPLS and IP over
802.1 TSN.  I also think it would be appropriate to have (future)
subsections that detail service delivery considerations for each.  I
also expect that certain service levels of  "DetNet QoS" will require
additional capabilities from traditional MPLS TE traffic flow
descriptions. 

on a related topic, what document do you expect to contain the technical
specification of "DetNet QoS"?

Thanks,
Lou

On 6/13/2017 10:29 AM, Jouni wrote:
> OK. Let's move towards the WG adoption call.
>
> - Jouni
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:detnet-dp-dt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa
>> Andersson
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 16:02 PM
>> To: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] merged Tal's text into the master branch
>>
>> Jouni,
>>
>> Does this mean that the meeting is cancelled?
>>
>> I agree that we should request working group adoption of the document now.
>>
>> /Loa
>>
>> On 2017-06-13 14:11, Jouni wrote:
>>> Forgot to send a note earlier but I cannot make it today for a call.
>>>
>>> The draft is getting into shape so unless there are bigger issues with
>>> the rest of the DT folks, I think we are getting to a point where DT
>>> work has been done and WG could take over. I still need to do the
>>> overall look over the document so let me know if there are still
>>> places where you think there is more technical (not plain editorial)
>> work to do.
>>> - Jouni
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Jouni [mailto:jouni.nospam@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2017 00:41 AM
>>>> To: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
>>>> Subject: merged Tal's text into the master branch
>>>>
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> I just merged Tal's edits to the master.
>>>>
>>>> - Jouni
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
>>> Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt
>>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
>> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
>> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
>> Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt
> _______________________________________________
> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
> Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email