Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github

Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Sat, 11 March 2017 12:32 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269991294B5 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:32:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=it-uc3m-es.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30MrfQtNOY9R for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:32:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x242.google.com (mail-wr0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51B3912943F for <Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:32:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x242.google.com with SMTP id u108so14548099wrb.2 for <Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:32:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=it-uc3m-es.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HWuY47Ectdnrs0rbFGPmlao2nAXjsvd0eu6oY8ec77c=; b=Z5oVlECBcR486h79rhPzw5xgQqL3FIyI/ynzdMZ0yuyWgXscs5nRdxbkTU5NNixEuY t/dlP+G2Uz9PvW5r7RAXHWIpMXRWAM+cWcw5SnvADhbRrX6sLuPasHLnWVoWjZBhuPKA QHTT7n0GL5K+rHhAXR44ReK/0Z+21eySR+uCeZrZhorVH1IpTCLPdjfusR1pHylD8iJi 5gCzwBF7UBLZI+mSmccQS5BxJK2PxKDr/e69BCuy3t12xzvQ5Td31bqInUX0WUatUl9z UfqT2kvjLWzT/Ju+oYlg2q8smeKxBMKbqmtsemDy3V9/seTw7nxl1pkLSUImufFGgpgF 5o3Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:date :in-reply-to:references:organization:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HWuY47Ectdnrs0rbFGPmlao2nAXjsvd0eu6oY8ec77c=; b=eAeGZ112lZSiUcja0th7FbBm58puvGhmNPqB4y4+c8/EHx9QnquJGmFhuE5SJHQgG1 T6XnatK8y0p+3xAJQJV0YdMVZ19BLXKQlNGiBbYgu0kn0P0iv8gUesBYrXZUsuUAvggx BtO+CngZKZckDeycKzP4ynDazEWLlh0zS02KEBSVSKTnD0oxXDFgjxYl8CaMJLBfdVdd 4r0AVoMYhee1DVjJA0CNTVrgYMEVmsWIsCAs9GrBQSQD1T9sHyOcD9XK9UeE6VZtuJaA /bKWjffzx57oZgOyRlQVaunEJLzdy7zBvsXXpO+B4MeeOh9bF14iWc4wJ5WpzfxT1wfP HqPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39m5JXFYrvZceC9CJo866fbW6v49wCndZFsnepPC+aGUCwYydH9HWrOqc7lFiMHtXlDx
X-Received: by 10.223.143.14 with SMTP id p14mr18778921wrb.120.1489235571757; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:32:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cjbc_dell.lan (85.251.161.16.dyn.user.ono.com. [85.251.161.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w97sm17155642wrc.20.2017.03.11.04.32.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:32:51 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1489235570.4666.2.camel@it.uc3m.es>
From: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs?= Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E1nos?= Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com>, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 13:32:50 +0100
In-Reply-To: <3eaa6ced-1493-a0da-125f-694567de0107@ericsson.com>
References: <88BD4A49-3A2C-44DD-A090-E7A3AAC8BF61@broadcom.com> <3eaa6ced-1493-a0da-125f-694567de0107@ericsson.com>
Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.5-1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/8Fehzscdhllw-2dBqdA_iHqShKA>
Cc: Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:32:56 -0000

Hi János,

Just one comment about "domain" below. 

On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 19:01 +0100, János Farkas wrote:
> Hi Jouni,
> 
> I've made some changes to the draft. The attached pdf indicates them.
> I've updated the xml version where you moved Balazs' text to be main 
> text. I hope i did not mess xml versioning.
> (the commented pdf is one version earlier)
> 
> Well, I did not make any dramatic change.
> I'd highlight two:
> a) replaced "data plane protocol" with "data plane solution". We are 
> working on solution as reflected by "sol" in the file name ;-). I
> mean, 
> a protocol is rather above the data plane, e.g., in the control
> plane.
> b) replaced "domain" with alternatives. DetNet is for single domain. 
> Actually, domain is an overloaded term: administrative domain, etc., 
> better to avoid.

I agree with you. I made some editorial changes before to align with
the draft-ietf-detnet-architecture document, where "DetNet domain" is
used. But I've checked again and it's true that domain is merely used
in the terminology section and not really in the text. Norm, maybe you
can consider removing "DetNet domain" from the arch document
(terminology section) so both docs are consistent.

I'm reviewing the draft. I'll soon send some updates (I expect them to
be just minor things/editorial).

Thanks,

Carlos

> 
> I highlighted one thing in the pdw, which I did not implement in the
> xml:
> "frame replication and elimination"
> The architecture document uses "packet replication and elimination", 
> which I think would be better to be used in this doc too; except for
> he 
> cases when we explicitly refer to 802.1CB.
> This appears multiple places, another variant: ""frame replication
> and 
> duplicate elimination".
> If there is agreement then we could make the change.
> 
> Regards,
> Janos
> 
> 
> On 3/10/2017 5:55 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
> > Folks,
> > 
> > I did quite a bit of updates to the draft. All in GitHub. I’ll
> > continue writing over the weekend etc..
> > 
> > - Jouni
> > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
> Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt