Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] DP DT solution draft slides for IETF99

"Jouni" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Fri, 14 July 2017 05:17 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560A412955F for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hG2hV9_NMdJO for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x241.google.com (mail-lf0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9090126D05 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x241.google.com with SMTP id t72so7285730lff.0 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-language:thread-index; bh=kySiRpE/shdG/DYOr1IIrEHLMYSsrCcYQ+k8s5iYAFQ=; b=JRnoRiH0rax4QYOYIOcxLzO0qqjx+iIu1qcMbmK0BCGIyoYuHp0wfo2en3nPw5RmPp y7026j92WNQCXRbrO/Z+aezdgKo4zjL4nFQwT5IQryQjOEcgIcgu1xJk1ybzoVW4m6L7 MallWn93iRarj4PXdafstfUJ/WxizlTzVpmIk9iLDmWCnnIRx9iizI6WWpXOIbIpJvXX p4bRWdwTInQt8K3cLZH85IfY+0VY01Skod6B8tSkh+QUOwtw0LrHCpfv/gYxRXVrDT99 q91brr+6Cfx4i0EgrA/0PCuxMurrVZ/PlC3M5hTlnAsDOBdC8k4q5q1Xgbaxj51cGkqo fl5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :thread-index; bh=kySiRpE/shdG/DYOr1IIrEHLMYSsrCcYQ+k8s5iYAFQ=; b=Lc/AigqVXxy5b49gMTYyoJunkHg/gt+nBGzCpVMvTCXQb9GuR9Z8ChsDXUiThlcbZs qxYLzoFdwS6hTMiHsctZS7cNt/4wXEb9PlYyIwkE0/R7CWKL5ywPn020E5LdknkOoF+J znB3MfkMDffzHTRQlWqNfk/iIKmMV/e2RT9E6RLHP6jV8cnYxGC2mEks51VcpqEPIrTf 3tYRihu30BzzFDw8SjS9fYuGUzYUKRs51a5LjsAT8wZ9oW9bck7dNFj49e7A5QZaaGPf 8haFJk2TJOIdxwevwDFXWLDu6QxY1Vs3jPiz5AZJBeW6BYk2ShZOD2qkX1GgixPF/G0E 1Mhw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112KDQWho6iKoWypXHD4haydKqFWZ13HaoMUT9Ag9/eFXaGnKeSe Ja3eyaD+28dPtg==
X-Received: by 10.46.75.9 with SMTP id y9mr181942lja.60.1500009434022; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from JOKO ([83.150.126.201]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 1sm1561625ljf.32.2017.07.13.22.17.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Jouni" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
To: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>, "'Korhonen, Jouni'" <Jouni.Korhonen@nordicsemi.no>, =?UTF-8?Q?'Bal=C3=A1zs_Varga_A'?= <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>, <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
References: <c815dbfd9d574366aa7775976fe24bce@nordicsemi.no> <DBXPR07MB128CD2139DFCC357D03F8A6ACAC0@DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <d7377e8b99b249c6ad852854225999b3@nordicsemi.no> <1499967565.8611.13.camel@it.uc3m.es>
In-Reply-To: <1499967565.8611.13.camel@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 08:17:12 +0300
Message-ID: <3cff01d2fc60$73416050$59c420f0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQFZs+EeIIlRHh+U1hkqDalIQmNoGgHy8aCSAqkXUO4BUPmMuqMV8KMg
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/9dpw3eN5boeJKRMMNkOrNtNojb4>
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] DP DT solution draft slides for IETF99
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:17:18 -0000

Thanks. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:detnet-dp-dt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 20:39 PM
> To: Korhonen, Jouni <Jouni.Korhonen@nordicsemi.no>no>; Balázs Varga A
> <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>om>; detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] DP DT solution draft slides for IETF99
> 
> Hi Jouni,
> 
> Thanks for preparing this. Some small comments below:
> 
> - Slide 6: I'd remove "native" in "PW-based native DetNet" to be
> consistent with the terms used in the draft (alternatively, I'd use "IPv6-
> based native DetNet" in slide 7for consistency with "PW-based native
> DetNet in slide 6).

Oops. Good catch.

> 
> - Slides 11 and 12: use the same order for "Flow-ID" and "SeqNum" on the
> slides (right hand side)

Ok.

 
> - Slide 11: though I have no concrete proposal, I think the S-label could
> be better introduced (maybe with a figure, also introducing the (DA-)T-PE
> and (DA-)S-PE node terminology).

Ok. I'll come up with something.


> 
> - Slide 14: "already be seen" --> "already been seen"

Ok.

- Jouni



> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Carlos
> 
> On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 13:57 +0000, Korhonen, Jouni wrote:
> > An update.. I am still doing the QoS etc part of the deck.
> >
> >
> > - Jouni
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Balázs Varga A [mailto:balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 12:54 PM
> > > To: Korhonen, Jouni <Jouni.Korhonen@nordicsemi.no>no>; detnet-dp-dt@ie
> > > tf.org
> > > Subject: RE: DP DT solution draft slides for IETF99
> > >
> > > Hi Jouni,
> > >
> > > Thanks for preparing this. Just some fast reactions:
> > > - slide5-6-7: we may receive a comment that it looks like only end-
> > > hosts having same type (TSN, MPLS, IPv6) can be interconnected.
> > > I would propose to add a note, that other combinations as depicted
> > > requires further considerations.
> > >
> > > - slide8: we have used the MS-PW analogy during our discussions.
> > > However
> > > it is valid only if PREF is used.
> > > I would propose to refer on the first bullet only to "PseudoWires"
> > > and
> > > "IPv6" as the two data plane solution.
> > > A further note could highlight the MS-PW analogy for PREF scenarios.
> > >
> > > - slide10-11: I would pair the DetNet flow specific information
> > > fields to be transported with the data plane encapsulation fields.
> > > 	DetNet flow	Encapsulation fields
> > > 	Flow ID:	PW label
> > > 	Seq. number: 	CW
> > >
> > > - slide14: regarding multicast DetNet flows I would formulate
> > > somewhat different. In my view we have considered p2p data plane
> > > solutions.
> > > The defined data plane works for DetNet flows having multicast dst-
> > > address assuming that the DetNet domain provides p2p connectivity.
> > > We may also receive comments that many DetNet flows are multicast
> > > (e.g., TSN flows using IEEE-FRER, etc.)
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Bala'zs
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:detnet-dp-dt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> > > Of Korhonen, Jouni
> > > Sent: 2017. július 12. 23:29
> > > To: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> > > Subject: [Detnet-dp-dt] DP DT solution draft slides for IETF99
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Sorry about this taking so long. Please, have a look and flame on..
> > > There's still time to work on the actual content. However, keep in
> > > mind that this is mainly an update from last time.
> > >
> > > - Jouni
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
> > Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
> Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt