Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Fwd: RE: Nits and XML2RFC - that might apply to our draft.

"Jouni" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Tue, 05 September 2017 10:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4C7132924 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 03:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QwvVWdnsTtyq for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 03:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com (mail-lf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF4C7132812 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 03:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id l196so9527615lfl.1 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 03:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=/DR826dzejumi0TxLgAJKuzj/I4lIhQ5NBAr+SIsI9c=; b=rrbJOVEOVJaqBLqfwYfhEOqxejW1J+uAC1UnEkxi8XCayq9xKnVXOxDGBuNlwqUwTU oX/AjRrZMLq22uncMVHy09xxgDVWFVk+s4r7P7ED02u+rpay3qzCLCOW9NSP41wuTREq DmKSWLUGYVM2mivkH4Zu6y+n2Nf8c093IwhTC2LZjWhB7o1fMxQQSFPNIBFHSOvCiyXo yYZv2jLW1+qvvExaix8TVkU7TgcxQo5FNenCDRAdpKOgpB7rdjfxVCmI42dWlpbQEC9F dDby9ZzZloXozosmj9PuVGMcPkQZaAjxPctbyx7fT44N3lTEqE3sZ9u6JhntiUSzK0XJ z7Ug==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=/DR826dzejumi0TxLgAJKuzj/I4lIhQ5NBAr+SIsI9c=; b=Qj3X9H2jOTRODLI59Pw2b0SqWtfgegDeslZ8XVRDN7UaclrLE5K1iqhLxK0f0L4lAq +AmLyHE9NUa+4iiSivF0mqta499jVeeaxID7QI+3+fPlARJ+ziqfgznuizL6IqBxO9PR d4WrLq02wL99gdrqfaal2GiGtRc8I6qeGabkP4Q0ATeUp4K5G1ZhTRMPMgQ2CqM1VCYD K4b2/pCqjRebm7KFjigsRq/+s+qX7eeR9xfN20IpDpw6rK9IWoKt24uBkVBrge3yjrAR weLCn9E0AG8LwIOp6K+BCR0wdiefYX2GdXzpmCn+fsJocBsmlFGW/47OmjTA4FZqE3xc cqnw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUg2WEySALlAL5NlMfeB8TZr3YHy3KZn2WigFQmm6c70PrpCPNat 7QKG9z2nR4Q2y5vQlVc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb7fWEpO446fAB8ZRWna62xqWeWJFOSxzVamHZvm3yNiRktGZszw8Pf1d+hj0a1n9d1T9f2Uzw==
X-Received: by 10.46.87.84 with SMTP id r20mr1103900ljd.121.1504608194759; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 03:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from JOKO (mobile-access-5d6acb-198.dhcp.inet.fi. [93.106.203.198]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s3sm63578ljd.62.2017.09.05.03.43.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Sep 2017 03:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Jouni" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
To: "'Loa Andersson'" <loa@pi.nu>, <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
References: <061901d3262e$ade196b0$09a4c410$@olddog.co.uk> <b22e4b75-70f3-6ac4-7986-a2610f206d6a@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <b22e4b75-70f3-6ac4-7986-a2610f206d6a@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 13:43:12 +0300
Message-ID: <07ed01d32633$c6723f40$5356bdc0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQKI8H73qhP+3JyaUsNP7ZDrMvaHoALGAvIEoSRWPbA=
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/B5lwiYVjz6XFrEwCuf7FBi4w_NY>
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Fwd: RE: Nits and XML2RFC - that might apply to our draft.
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 10:43:19 -0000

Yeah. The draft is now at secretariat manual posting queue anyway.

- Jouni

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:detnet-dp-dt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa
> Andersson
> Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 13:14 PM
> To: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> Subject: [Detnet-dp-dt] Fwd: RE: Nits and XML2RFC - that might apply to
> our draft.
> 
> Jouni,
> 
> I think this is part of the explanation to the nits we received on out
> draft. I have not checked, but it seems reasonable.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: RE: Nits and XML2RFC
> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:06:42 +0100
> From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>;
> Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
> To: 'Christian Huitema' <huitema@huitema.net>;, ietf@ietf.org
> 
> Christian,
> 
> The "bug" is that xml2rfc now inserts
> "https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/" and
> "https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info" whereas idnits checks for
> "http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/" and
> "http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info"
> 
> Cheers,
> Adrian
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian
> > Huitema
> > Sent: 04 September 2017 20:53
> > To: ietf@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: Nits and XML2RFC
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/4/2017 12:42 PM, Christian Huitema wrote:
> > > I just formatted a draft using xml2rfc and the online tool,
> > > https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/. Then I submitted the result for
> > > publication. And it was refused because the submission checking tool
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/ found 4 errors in the copyright
> > > and IPR boilerplate. This is weird, because my draft used the
> > > xml2rfc option ipr="trust200902". But it seems that the xml2rfc tool
> > > and the submission checking tool disagree. I get an interesting
> > > message, complaining about errors such as this one: ....
> > > As far as I can tell, the only difference between one text and the
> > > other are the position of the line breaks. Of course, the line
> > > breaks are chosen by the editing tool, and I have no control.
> > >
> > > Any suggestion on how to fix my draft?
> > >
> > OK, I managed to fix the submission. My mistake was to submit both a
> > text document and an XML document. Since the xml2rfc editor used by
> > the submission tool produces a slightly different format than the
> > xml2rfc online tool, this generated nits. Probably the results of some
> > recent change. Anyhow, I fixed the submission by submitting only the
> > XML document. That appeared to be working.
> >
> > --
> > Christian Huitema
> 
> 
> --
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
> Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt