Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Fwd: RE: Nits and XML2RFC

Yeah. The draft is now at secretariat manual posting queue anyway.

- Jouni

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:detnet-dp-dt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa
> Andersson
> Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 13:14 PM
> To: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> Subject: [Detnet-dp-dt] Fwd: RE: Nits and XML2RFC - that might apply to
> our draft.
> 
> Jouni,
> 
> I think this is part of the explanation to the nits we received on out
> draft. I have not checked, but it seems reasonable.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: RE: Nits and XML2RFC
> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:06:42 +0100
> From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
> To: 'Christian Huitema' <huitema@huitema.net>, ietf@ietf.org
> 
> Christian,
> 
> The "bug" is that xml2rfc now inserts
> "https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/" and
> "https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info" whereas idnits checks for
> "http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/" and
> "http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info"
> 
> Cheers,
> Adrian
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian
> > Huitema
> > Sent: 04 September 2017 20:53
> > To: ietf@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: Nits and XML2RFC
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/4/2017 12:42 PM, Christian Huitema wrote:
> > > I just formatted a draft using xml2rfc and the online tool,
> > > https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/. Then I submitted the result for
> > > publication. And it was refused because the submission checking tool
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/ found 4 errors in the copyright
> > > and IPR boilerplate. This is weird, because my draft used the
> > > xml2rfc option ipr="trust200902". But it seems that the xml2rfc tool
> > > and the submission checking tool disagree. I get an interesting
> > > message, complaining about errors such as this one: ....
> > > As far as I can tell, the only difference between one text and the
> > > other are the position of the line breaks. Of course, the line
> > > breaks are chosen by the editing tool, and I have no control.
> > >
> > > Any suggestion on how to fix my draft?
> > >
> > OK, I managed to fix the submission. My mistake was to submit both a
> > text document and an XML document. Since the xml2rfc editor used by
> > the submission tool produces a slightly different format than the
> > xml2rfc online tool, this generated nits. Probably the results of some
> > recent change. Anyhow, I fixed the submission by submitting only the
> > XML document. That appeared to be working.
> >
> > --
> > Christian Huitema
> 
> 
> --
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
> Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt

Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Fwd: RE: Nits and XML2RFC - that might apply to our draft.