IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way forward? was Re: quick notes from call 2/14/15

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com> Sun, 19 February 2017 07:29 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E36B128824 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:29:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LIrB_SNXwTAC for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:29:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x233.google.com (mail-pg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B696512706D for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:29:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x233.google.com with SMTP id a123so4326160pgc.0 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:29:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=xH33q9KB4r46LSemfhTnzFme8IEB3qtB9witjA16w3Y=; b=Md60V3Nv61cmbgKsMrMTZxdkDVAfRcJ1SZH05mDjSb/T1HgCTdtl/IQyyeKSCaHTan LYgs22g3Vut4hAcK9EhfkMnZ2edDD4vT0qsT0zk+7DT3FMvt+2e2/Lli51+NpVrzERjy P6Q/nTsQrGOK7GsCFtbH/OnbB0o3SIKzhPr+g=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=xH33q9KB4r46LSemfhTnzFme8IEB3qtB9witjA16w3Y=; b=ifescf9Fv2Hk/Bud6fy+R4bXBk4bG4WtObPPxtKvp+UrXvlZsuoghsH2zTZRsIZ9HJ U/GEjh8/mP5v922KWdP3TLJL0EAnclZRCCZmVi5Bk9SitH3qbomhVnjg2MCAZP/SNQsO 6+IEhMRWn6ixfHU1dy8VWdywquwGRZKGyJPEEE9TkGl3gW+U3YuFk6Lcrnj3v01x6cba 5LdUVoMqtKjsxEvVW1aRS5W4Xo4PBnaHuPZ93AzjUx2ZTkb2+v1Uby3E7XHXLRWFVjLd fWhwvIYzeiLTrB+ViPx5BVE1sbbd02Jgljd1mx+R7luCDB1IgCdisjphwXiLxP9a5mgp 7KwA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kG3+mM+N/+hByp794jVDFCXWGMFCe2+/RTt4KZocRdomuOnsyU+6tr2+PJxhb8IY4m
X-Received: by 10.99.48.68 with SMTP id w65mr20173233pgw.107.1487489360990; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:29:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4200:e520:586f:7a7b:79d4:7376? ([2601:647:4200:e520:586f:7a7b:79d4:7376]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z70sm28287765pff.26.2017.02.18.23.29.19 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:29:19 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <c9e9931d-6f74-9ae0-2e34-e400c5cf92b4@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:29:18 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AA485196-3AC7-4D0B-BD3A-A61E07AF23D7@broadcom.com>
References: <BDABA4E9-F3F5-4EA3-BB16-BE877A70F0B6@broadcom.com> <FBC4D57C-51D4-41A8-95D7-56AF22084852@broadcom.com> <9E4E59F6-0E62-476B-897F-D2D59E94C6EB@broadcom.com> <f3bbb70a-0f5d-b515-6c5a-1d31ba5ae5a2@pi.nu> <6F2B8081-ADB8-4B4F-BACD-78DFB63B8FBE@broadcom.com> <bbfe82c3-5127-31de-01b7-3e6e820d5142@pi.nu> <EA2608B3-C11A-444B-B1E8-379B8A195B6D@broadcom.com> <c9e9931d-6f74-9ae0-2e34-e400c5cf92b4@pi.nu>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/BwgPmrF8DvuFCZG5YlWAY5tZH-E>
Cc: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way forward? was Re: quick notes from call 2/14/15
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 07:29:23 -0000

Loa,

> On 18 Feb 2017, at 23:26, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 2017-02-19 15:22, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>> 
> <snip>
>>> I don't follow - let us say we have one Ethernet and one TDM PW crossing
>>> the domain, id e use the same d-pw label, how do we know which one we
>>> do Ethernet NSP and which one we do TDM NSP on??
>> 
>> Of course each e2e detnet flow have their own d-pw. Otherwise you cannot make a difference between them. Being the same means an e2e detnet flow would have a single d-pw label throughout the detnet/administrative domain in each x-PE.
>> 
> OK . so what you are saying is that replicated packets will have the same d-pw? I agree to that!

Yes. 

- JOuni

> 
> /Loa
>> - Jouni
> <snip>
> -- 
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email