IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github

János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com> Sun, 12 March 2017 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <Janos.Farkas@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF73129521 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 13:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bOT-BZpDIo_1 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 13:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F371B12951E for <Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 13:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f6fff70000006a1c-91-58c5aefc5aeb
Received: from ESESSHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.39]) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 9D.86.27164.CFEA5C85; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 21:26:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [100.94.32.248] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.319.2; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 21:26:35 +0100
To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
References: <88BD4A49-3A2C-44DD-A090-E7A3AAC8BF61@broadcom.com> <3eaa6ced-1493-a0da-125f-694567de0107@ericsson.com> <EEF82160-BCA3-4C22-8C81-4D76EC8B9BDB@broadcom.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=a1nos_Farkas?= <janos.farkas@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <d0fb128d-89b6-ec51-97ba-42335eedb8a3@ericsson.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 21:26:48 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <EEF82160-BCA3-4C22-8C81-4D76EC8B9BDB@broadcom.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------183908A329D3BE8A29BB1861"
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7uu6/dUcjDE694LBYNWEtm8XDLwkO TB6z7p9l81iy5CdTAFMUl01Kak5mWWqRvl0CV8bFvsWMBcskK54+6mBtYDwh0sXIySEhYCLx /84B5i5GLg4hgXWMEn9mHWCHcFYzSrTsWsYOUiUsYCRxY+5axi5GDg4RAQOJ/wfL4Gp+nV3M BlLDLCAtsX/1JEYQm03AXuLupQ3MIPW8QPapEykgYRYBVYmPH/rZQcKiAjES6/sSQMK8AoIS J2c+YQEJcwo4SEz7kwUxMEziy7P3TCC2kICaxKe3D9knMPLPQtIxC0kZhG0hMXP+eUYIW16i eetsZghbQ6J1zlx2ZPEFjGyrGEWLU4uTctONjPRSizKTi4vz8/TyUks2MQID+OCW3wY7GF8+ dzzEKMDBqMTDu2HW0Qgh1sSy4srcQ4wSHMxKIrwGa4BCvCmJlVWpRfnxRaU5qcWHGKU5WJTE ec1W3g8XEkhPLEnNTk0tSC2CyTJxcEo1MAonP/1+qz1Pyzpz2pTid9K1T6X5l/E1nuUTYZDg em2yP1c09n9GufEHHsZJPuc2lr63Lfo5Y2Vrd41nkENTsnTYvGZnq971q3R2a8v4qd76aOmp +/qrVcQe0/w+nrI3D35dsXogls6zdZ7LgVTL6xPrMlgNRJ9+uHfK9uKRSetDnqrsrWRjU2Ip zkg01GIuKk4EAAIpCexcAgAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/DNt5qkeiTdtklqSSbea-GvPgTLo>
Cc: Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 20:26:42 -0000

Hi Jouni,

Well, it is just " Packet Replication and Elimination":
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-detnet-architecture-00#section-3.4

Well, PRE as acronym may be strange.

If we want to copy the logic of 802.1CM title, then it'd be:
Packet Replication and Elimination for Reliability (PRER)

In any case, I think the key is to use packet instead of frame.

Thanks,
Janos


On 3/10/2017 9:22 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>> I highlighted one thing in the pdw, which I did not implement in the xml:
>> >"frame replication and elimination"
>> >The architecture document uses "packet replication and elimination", which I think would be better to be used in this doc too; except for he cases when we explicitly refer to 802.1CB.
>> >This appears multiple places, another variant: ""frame replication and duplicate elimination".
>> >If there is agreement then we could make the change.
> Let’s go for the arch doc way. So “Packet Replication and Elimination for Redundancy” (PREF) ?
>
> - Jouni
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email