Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] a quick look at the replication/discarding case for detnet flows

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com> Sat, 21 January 2017 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45AE129B49 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 08:28:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fj2GG9JZYeUl for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 08:28:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x230.google.com (mail-qt0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14156129A84 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 08:28:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x230.google.com with SMTP id v23so71433066qtb.0 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 08:28:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kHqxEwCWB8INb9g8o4DcC8t5vE2YVC81hBbkkvvyf1A=; b=GMEYCfDL/T6zO/bgMClgR26ihjvi2QFAZhOXWjdjzPXnRwF1t3xlCYhaOxGXRxlwk/ 0Z9gCU2/M95rv9QTArvN6YZaz5FboPHxZqzBx0WF7Ayur3iYwztfwwTverT/S4AJjEQt 2Gw7hiHTHuzIlBIoYIH/Xb3P6yEO710F5VDoI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kHqxEwCWB8INb9g8o4DcC8t5vE2YVC81hBbkkvvyf1A=; b=mecUguXUUofS4NpzLZCVd+IoQPRChe0r+XTob87VYgfp8KxNWT4/F7EWDped3eYwd9 V1diNtW2RsZfFazkf5+72TIT2r5LchsYsSvZhXDas5VIBMTcxjRwhHXtQvAjL2KEAHUi e1biNJj7fSe7VHnE9i8WwFISwdTADr/9CoZfV8agta0kKKxRIRcJvVmjdGk43FA3mooi XGUpMVh9LoZAAvbOpBbzlfY7siEcTlE+3DN0MhdP/SDIoiPLG8POUu0OliGRlcX6omsv xwK9jmhROY/E5VN7XCxSIQqa2NvvnQUqDtyGz3Lt0InIs6uzo3uNkBy8dNCP+//UXh9x YGXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKMRHVz/oth4XRZRQzrCKv55lGTNVLvnP+TeZ/eXRQjQ3dFYUbDJD5PQQL/bG8EpAZZvnO0LffuXhDUl9HV
X-Received: by 10.200.47.46 with SMTP id j43mr16763394qta.178.1485016079769; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 08:27:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
References: <6ff03919-9584-0a48-da2e-7ded7d2aacbb@pi.nu> <5116AE7C-E0F3-473A-9FE7-B17A7FF82DA6@broadcom.com> <1470015091.61923.1485012103902@itx66.prod.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <1470015091.61923.1485012103902@itx66.prod.google.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 08:27:57 -0800
Message-ID: <-4407507652711782750@unknownmsgid>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/DULIx7tZyRgq3Dk8kjFjZiT8YE0>
Cc: "detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org" <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] a quick look at the replication/discarding case for detnet flows
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:28:03 -0000

Loa,

Ok. Thanks.  I think we also need to make clear that php is not always
necessarily done.

Jouni

Sent from a smart phone.. Mind the typos..

> On Jan 20, 2017, at 21:25, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
>
> Jouni,
>
>
>> On 2017-01-21 10:47, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>> Loa,
>>
>> Thanks for the slides. The slide 9 is exactly what I was after with my e2e PW labels. Now the question: “I don’t know if there is currently enough capabilities in LDP to merge, unless we merge all traffic with the same FEC on the same outgoing outer label.” I cannot claim expertise in LDP
>
> If you have the same forwarding class and destination (part of the FEC
> defintion) LDP will merge. This mean that all detnet traffic from one
> node will arrive at D on the same (transport) LSP. I think this is fine
> since the label for that LDP is php'ed.
>  to be able to have any kind of educated view here. So if we are not
> going to be able to merge we would “waste” additional transport label
> between C->D?
>
> Yes but that is a label that will be unique for a link, we are not
> running into problems until we start trying to use domaion wide unique
> labels.
>
>  Duplicated would have been eliminated, thus there is no bandwidth impact.
>
> Correct!
>
> I do not think that would be an issue. It is no optimal but works.
>
> Well - I guess we could find some minor optimizations, but this wuth
> merging and php this is close to optimal.
>
> /Loa
>>
>> - Jouni
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jouni Korhonen, Broadcom Ltd.
>> M: +1-408-391-7160
>>
>>> On Jan 13, 2017, at 8:28 PM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
>>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I took a quick look at the replication / discarding case we talked about at the meeting this week.
>>>
>>> Please remember that so far this is not a proposal, just a demonstration
>>> that there is at least one way of doing it.
>>>
>>> What is there can bee revised, improved, changed or discarded if we
>>> find something better. Take a look a send comments.
>>>
>>> /loa
>>>
>>> Warning: I have a grave case of dyslexia, so any odd or inventive
>>> spelling is pure accident.
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
>>> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
>>> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>>> <detnet-replication.pptx>_______________________________________________
>>> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
>>> Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt
>>
>
> --
>
>
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64