IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github

János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com> Sun, 12 March 2017 23:43 UTC

Return-Path: <Janos.Farkas@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE229129426 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06Y2dAVEQg22 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D05DF129413 for <Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-a57ff70000004cad-40-58c5dd27d560
Received: from ESESSHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.39]) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id AC.9C.19629.72DD5C85; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:43:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [100.94.32.248] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.319.2; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:43:35 +0100
To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
References: <88BD4A49-3A2C-44DD-A090-E7A3AAC8BF61@broadcom.com> <3eaa6ced-1493-a0da-125f-694567de0107@ericsson.com> <EEF82160-BCA3-4C22-8C81-4D76EC8B9BDB@broadcom.com> <d0fb128d-89b6-ec51-97ba-42335eedb8a3@ericsson.com> <81940808-F98E-4C26-8D3F-474BA056FFD9@broadcom.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=a1nos_Farkas?= <janos.farkas@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <f34e6650-ecce-c3fb-dc99-f7fc9d688aab@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:43:48 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <81940808-F98E-4C26-8D3F-474BA056FFD9@broadcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7uq7G3aMRBqum8FusmrCWzeLhlwQH Jo9Z98+yeSxZ8pMpgCmKyyYlNSezLLVI3y6BK2PynMlMBWeZK3beaWdtYHzJ1MXIySEhYCJx 798dti5GLg4hgXWMEud6rrFAOKsZJfZ/uw1WJSxgJHFj7lrGLkYODhEBA4n/B8sgaqYzSdw/ PYURpIZZQFpi/+pJYDabgL3E3UsbmEFsXiB7z/W/LCA2i4CqxIlH3ewgc0QFYiTW9yVAlAhK nJz5BKyEU8BBYt6dr1AjLSRmzj8PZctLNG+dDTZSSEBN4tPbh+wTGAVmIWmfhaRlFpKWBYzM qxhFi1OLk3LTjYz1Uosyk4uL8/P08lJLNjECg/Lglt+qOxgvv3E8xCjAwajEw7th1tEIIdbE suLK3EOMEhzMSiK8LjOBQrwpiZVVqUX58UWlOanFhxilOViUxHnNVt4PFxJITyxJzU5NLUgt gskycXBKNTCGdobFLGff42rz6N/ibzc/bul6k9InpMFwu3/xo56P5hH88w+GlS5kMeQWXzS1 b3mTH9/f2rLJMi+C76myLmP1OL2eaeaq2oPMAgK6qpv299lzvf7bzHHnl0hOhuuN5NW3RBU+ nPFc/+G5YO8Rk/3dE2Yyb/+s4RXx98sDs7qPM4/n7TyZf4hfiaU4I9FQi7moOBEAVlq7ZkYC AAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/Deum5S40JjZZQ8TKCIt0rmz0w9s>
Cc: Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 23:43:39 -0000


On 3/12/2017 11:54 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
> I see I wrote into the terminology PRER.. later in the text I use PREF (i.e., packet replication and elimination function). I actually prefer the latter since in most cases it fits imho best to the context. I’ll figure out some alignment..
Either one is fine with me.
Thanks for the clarifications!

>
> I think you meant 802.1CB and not 802.1CM ;)
Sure, correct.
Thanks,
Janos

>
> - Jouni
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email