Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way forward? was Re: quick notes from call 2/14/15
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sun, 19 February 2017 07:31 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF8512706D
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:31:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id v6iQ2p9mlQsU for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:31:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141])
(using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27060126D74
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:31:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [122.52.25.23])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu)
by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CAD4818013BE;
Sun, 19 Feb 2017 08:31:43 +0100 (CET)
To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
References: <BDABA4E9-F3F5-4EA3-BB16-BE877A70F0B6@broadcom.com>
<FBC4D57C-51D4-41A8-95D7-56AF22084852@broadcom.com>
<9E4E59F6-0E62-476B-897F-D2D59E94C6EB@broadcom.com>
<f3bbb70a-0f5d-b515-6c5a-1d31ba5ae5a2@pi.nu>
<6F2B8081-ADB8-4B4F-BACD-78DFB63B8FBE@broadcom.com>
<bbfe82c3-5127-31de-01b7-3e6e820d5142@pi.nu>
<EA2608B3-C11A-444B-B1E8-379B8A195B6D@broadcom.com>
<c9e9931d-6f74-9ae0-2e34-e400c5cf92b4@pi.nu>
<AA485196-3AC7-4D0B-BD3A-A61E07AF23D7@broadcom.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <646064e3-01b7-407f-1640-c9aa4e9827bb@pi.nu>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 15:31:36 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AA485196-3AC7-4D0B-BD3A-A61E07AF23D7@broadcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/Hb4309IoHYU0HwEkg6G86jKEvzs>
Cc: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way forward? was Re:
quick notes from call 2/14/15
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>,
<mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>,
<mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 07:31:47 -0000
Jouni, The we have the problem I tried to describe in the slides I just sent? Or at lest I think so. I would be very happy to be wrong. /Loa On 2017-02-19 15:29, Jouni Korhonen wrote: > Loa, > >> On 18 Feb 2017, at 23:26, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2017-02-19 15:22, Jouni Korhonen wrote: >>> >> <snip> >>>> I don't follow - let us say we have one Ethernet and one TDM PW crossing >>>> the domain, id e use the same d-pw label, how do we know which one we >>>> do Ethernet NSP and which one we do TDM NSP on?? >>> >>> Of course each e2e detnet flow have their own d-pw. Otherwise you cannot make a difference between them. Being the same means an e2e detnet flow would have a single d-pw label throughout the detnet/administrative domain in each x-PE. >>> >> OK . so what you are saying is that replicated packets will have the same d-pw? I agree to that! > > Yes. > > - JOuni > >> >> /Loa >>> - Jouni >> <snip> >> -- >> >> >> Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com >> Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu >> Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 > -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [Detnet-dp-dt] quick notes from call 2/14/15 Jouni Korhonen
- [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way forward… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way for… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way for… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way for… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way for… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way for… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way for… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way for… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way for… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way for… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way for… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way for… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way for… Loa Andersson
- [Detnet-dp-dt] An optional scheme that can suppor… Jiangyuanlong
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] An optional scheme that can su… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] An optional scheme that can su… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] An optional scheme that can su… Jiangyuanlong
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] An optional scheme that can su… Jiangyuanlong
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way for… Jiangyuanlong
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way for… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] FRER example.. maybe a way for… Jiangyuanlong
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] quick notes from call 2/14/15 Jiangyuanlong