Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github

[János Farkas <[e-mail]>]

Hi Carlos,

Sorry for the late response; it is a mess due to the 802 Plenary.
We discussed "domain" while updating the architecture draft. DetNet is 
chartered for single administrative domain; furthermore, domain is a bit 
overloaded term. That's why it is better to avoid it as much as possible.

Thanks,
Janos


On 3/11/2017 1:32 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote:
> Hi János,
>
> Just one comment about "domain" below.
>
> On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 19:01 +0100, János Farkas wrote:
>> Hi Jouni,
>>
>> I've made some changes to the draft. The attached pdf indicates them.
>> I've updated the xml version where you moved Balazs' text to be main
>> text. I hope i did not mess xml versioning.
>> (the commented pdf is one version earlier)
>>
>> Well, I did not make any dramatic change.
>> I'd highlight two:
>> a) replaced "data plane protocol" with "data plane solution". We are
>> working on solution as reflected by "sol" in the file name ;-). I
>> mean,
>> a protocol is rather above the data plane, e.g., in the control
>> plane.
>> b) replaced "domain" with alternatives. DetNet is for single domain.
>> Actually, domain is an overloaded term: administrative domain, etc.,
>> better to avoid.
> I agree with you. I made some editorial changes before to align with
> the draft-ietf-detnet-architecture document, where "DetNet domain" is
> used. But I've checked again and it's true that domain is merely used
> in the terminology section and not really in the text. Norm, maybe you
> can consider removing "DetNet domain" from the arch document
> (terminology section) so both docs are consistent.
>
> I'm reviewing the draft. I'll soon send some updates (I expect them to
> be just minor things/editorial).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carlos
>
>> I highlighted one thing in the pdw, which I did not implement in the
>> xml:
>> "frame replication and elimination"
>> The architecture document uses "packet replication and elimination",
>> which I think would be better to be used in this doc too; except for
>> he
>> cases when we explicitly refer to 802.1CB.
>> This appears multiple places, another variant: ""frame replication
>> and
>> duplicate elimination".
>> If there is agreement then we could make the change.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Janos
>>
>>
>> On 3/10/2017 5:55 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I did quite a bit of updates to the draft. All in GitHub. I’ll
>>> continue writing over the weekend etc..
>>>
>>> - Jouni
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt