Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Fwd: RE: Nits and XML2RFC - that might apply to our draft.

Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com> Wed, 06 September 2017 01:20 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F5C132E41 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 18:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lzRSysgHcM33 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 18:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE4F2132E3C for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 18:20:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO LHREML712-CAH.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DNZ10514; Wed, 06 Sep 2017 01:20:37 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.49) by LHREML712-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 02:20:36 +0100
Received: from DGGEML507-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.7]) by dggeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.3.17.49]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:20:23 +0800
From: Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
To: Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, "'Loa Andersson'" <loa@pi.nu>, "detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org" <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Detnet-dp-dt] Fwd: RE: Nits and XML2RFC - that might apply to our draft.
Thread-Index: AQHTJi/KXgqmknt0pEmCdoWbAnsKP6KllQ4AgAF5KnA=
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 01:20:23 +0000
Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68BBB59C846@dggeml507-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <061901d3262e$ade196b0$09a4c410$@olddog.co.uk> <b22e4b75-70f3-6ac4-7986-a2610f206d6a@pi.nu> <07ed01d32633$c6723f40$5356bdc0$@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <07ed01d32633$c6723f40$5356bdc0$@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.74.202.215]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-7"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090202.59AF4D65.0096, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.2.7, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: d4db821b39941369e141d3123244e282
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/SeTbO5SLp5bIw_NAzv-fPLRaiZc>
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Fwd: RE: Nits and XML2RFC - that might apply to our draft.
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 01:20:42 -0000

I think the current document can be sent directly to the Detnet WG mailing list.
A new revision may ensue with further discussions in the WG. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:detnet-dp-dt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2017 6:43 PM
To: 'Loa Andersson'; detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Fwd: RE: Nits and XML2RFC - that might apply to our draft.

Yeah. The draft is now at secretariat manual posting queue anyway.

- Jouni

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:detnet-dp-dt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
> Loa Andersson
> Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 13:14 PM
> To: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> Subject: [Detnet-dp-dt] Fwd: RE: Nits and XML2RFC - that might apply 
> to our draft.
> 
> Jouni,
> 
> I think this is part of the explanation to the nits we received on out 
> draft. I have not checked, but it seems reasonable.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: RE: Nits and XML2RFC
> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:06:42 +0100
> From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>;
> Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
> To: 'Christian Huitema' <huitema@huitema.net>;, ietf@ietf.org
> 
> Christian,
> 
> The "bug" is that xml2rfc now inserts
> "https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/" and 
> "https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info" whereas idnits checks for 
> "http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/" and 
> "http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info"
> 
> Cheers,
> Adrian
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian 
> > Huitema
> > Sent: 04 September 2017 20:53
> > To: ietf@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: Nits and XML2RFC
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/4/2017 12:42 PM, Christian Huitema wrote:
> > > I just formatted a draft using xml2rfc and the online tool, 
> > > https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/. Then I submitted the result for 
> > > publication. And it was refused because the submission checking 
> > > tool https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/ found 4 errors in the 
> > > copyright and IPR boilerplate. This is weird, because my draft 
> > > used the xml2rfc option ipr="trust200902". But it seems that the 
> > > xml2rfc tool and the submission checking tool disagree. I get an 
> > > interesting message, complaining about errors such as this one: ....
> > > As far as I can tell, the only difference between one text and the 
> > > other are the position of the line breaks. Of course, the line 
> > > breaks are chosen by the editing tool, and I have no control.
> > >
> > > Any suggestion on how to fix my draft?
> > >
> > OK, I managed to fix the submission. My mistake was to submit both a 
> > text document and an XML document. Since the xml2rfc editor used by 
> > the submission tool produces a slightly different format than the 
> > xml2rfc online tool, this generated nits. Probably the results of 
> > some recent change. Anyhow, I fixed the submission by submitting 
> > only the XML document. That appeared to be working.
> >
> > --
> > Christian Huitema
> 
> 
> --
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
> Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt

_______________________________________________
Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt