Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] [EXT] DETNET Synchronization Slides
Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com> Thu, 09 February 2017 20:35 UTC
Return-Path: <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0399B1295CD
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:35:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 7_zzQNTiPnfm for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:35:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x233.google.com (mail-pf0-x233.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE11F129C77
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:35:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id 189so3030510pfu.3
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 12:35:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google;
h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
bh=SxN7q8lK60xp5AAAeUaFbBDKvYoBd7PGkLRavMvXKJU=;
b=c8QHzRCvuXaR5BfBv6ZqyQuc8jLmUsnHJomEdrH8DUVyr6LwILGpXN0q8tOsuyI/sl
S1wswzwjXHo2rb36FCQS4jCWo9x2O8jkEvIW5lgiya3+WFSgDYjN8+DDNQVeqOVEPAXd
iXHjgGmlnSmuUTsR3eCSFn8vfGLd+94LhUH7I=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
bh=SxN7q8lK60xp5AAAeUaFbBDKvYoBd7PGkLRavMvXKJU=;
b=U2Pv6cOGJb2ZDW2cTT1BHPxmjXjXjqHyUAu4iW+uI8D6ICnXFXeEfoSAkSSlOmImXO
muAD1zlta7/SZexfUtEZOtHYyFyKvQvOlGvgyTs/Dhb+Z7L1GIN3Rk0pl75gK9e5ssuT
DkOYH8ufjLP6Lcdpl+tP0nrREHvVAEsrBuTquwhglr+cTk0hNEkkKkJtTFktOXpx3iOr
3H9lw0Qg0HKlcOr4iT87USStyHPU2HtXcm0eUc50hnqdArj/MAFjNyyPr1o8HsSFfHG0
/bxHa2oHnMbCRi8tPDi4SD9fPfDqK/xWTYtL/lzVAE9VBE7LtLSXJM4VlSDkTE0eUUgk
DkHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kSxv+Fmimy7a8w5D6XnFcHiX6YIuHuiFuMADR0++BxFATEucRHMOfWtZ73OV4GwVlt
X-Received: by 10.84.224.198 with SMTP id k6mr2499019pln.27.1486672511083;
Thu, 09 Feb 2017 12:35:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.5] (c-24-5-144-221.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.144.221])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
r16sm31041014pfg.76.2017.02.09.12.35.10
(version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128);
Thu, 09 Feb 2017 12:35:10 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <5399b34b24804c13a2d8e171e1677683@IL-EXCH01.marvell.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:35:04 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <97AF77D4-8378-4BAA-9B5B-F411C4096B28@broadcom.com>
References: <b6721061760841cc8e71f2634bc3b1b7@IL-EXCH01.marvell.com>
<97CA9DEF-1BD1-4317-AD32-95D0E0D90A5D@broadcom.com>
<5399b34b24804c13a2d8e171e1677683@IL-EXCH01.marvell.com>
To: Tal Mizrahi <talmi@marvell.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/T3QTTxaBn3Q5cXCCN_LsGFua1eY>
Cc: "detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org" <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] [EXT] DETNET Synchronization Slides
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>,
<mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>,
<mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 20:35:23 -0000
Tal, I understood that in 2) the TC function would only be in the PW nodes we define leaving all intermediate “normal” LSRs between PW nodes as a source of higher inaccuracy. If this was not a correct understanding then the value in 2) is likely too high. - Jouni > On 08 Feb 2017, at 23:22, Tal Mizrahi <talmi@marvell.com> wrote: > > Hi Jouni, > > Sorry for not explaining the accuracy numbers on slide 6 further. I made some changes following the discussion, and also added notes saying that the accuracy will depend on the network topology and on the number of hops. > > Regarding approach 2, I believe sub-microsecond accuracy can certainly be achieved using transparent clocks in a real network. There are quite a few publications that show this. Here are a couple: > - For example, China Mobile have revealed in a keynote lecture in ISPCS 2014 that they have measured an accuracy of 266 ns over 30 hops of transparent clocks. Unfortunately, this presentation is not in the public domain, but a short version of it is available (https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc/current/pdfp9ceHphbcE.pdf). > - Another example: http://wwwen.zte.com.cn/endata/magazine/ztecommunications/2010Year/no3/articles/201009/t20100913_191838.html > But again, this entirely depends on the nature of the network. > > Regarding approach 1, the accuracy will entirely depend on the network topology (the number of hops, the physical distance, the type of intermediate nodes, the delay variation). Hundreds of microseconds is just an example. Some of the research I took part in showed that in a multi-site public cloud network you can achieve a precision on the order of hundreds of microseconds using PTP without on-path support (https://sites.google.com/site/talmizrahihome/files/TaaSInfocomFinal.pdf?attredirects=0). But again, this entirely depends on the nature of the network. > > Please let me know if there are further comments. > > Thanks, > Tal. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jouni Korhonen [mailto:jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 8:15 PM >> To: Tal Mizrahi >> Cc: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org >> Subject: [EXT] Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] DETNET Synchronization Slides >> >> External Email >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Thanks Tal, >> >> Didn’t we also agree adjusting the slide 6 “typical accuracy” numbers: >> 1) <1ms or hundreds of us >> 2) <tens of us >> 3) <1us >> >> - Jouni >> >> >> -- >> Jouni Korhonen, Broadcom Ltd. >> M: +1-408-391-7160 >> >>> On Feb 7, 2017, at 10:51 PM, Tal Mizrahi <talmi@marvell.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The slides from today’s weekly meeting are attached. >>> I slightly updated them after the meeting based on the comments. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Tal. >>> <Synchronization in >> DETNET.pptx>_______________________________________________ >>> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list >>> Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt >
- [Detnet-dp-dt] DETNET Synchronization Slides Tal Mizrahi
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] DETNET Synchronization Slides János Farkas
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] DETNET Synchronization Slides Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] DETNET Synchronization Slides Balázs Varga A
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] DETNET Synchronization Slides Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] [EXT] Re: DETNET Synchronizati… Tal Mizrahi
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] [EXT] DETNET Synchronization S… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] [EXT] DETNET Synchronization S… Tal Mizrahi
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] [EXT] DETNET Synchronization S… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] [EXT] DETNET Synchronization S… Tal Mizrahi
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] [EXT] DETNET Synchronization S… Norman Finn