Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] revised architecture draft in github

Balázs Varga A <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com> Wed, 29 March 2017 03:50 UTC

Return-Path: <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF76127058 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VQdMMTSjzqQY for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E38E212955E for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-64c6598000005be8-ef-58db2f0839b4
Received: from ESESSHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id AA.D0.23528.80F2BD85; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 05:50:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUR02-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (153.88.183.145) by oa.msg.ericsson.com (153.88.183.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.339.0; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 05:50:01 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-ericsson-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=cxMChTYEP1hWpfA/Eab9e8hmO+s9wjCgkxbby5K5nTg=; b=hSi5aIrgl293aHmky3nv3v+2UP9sw9DOUS6zb/TY7mkRgvMyA0QYGikMdesBk/ukvUzLHPLGZNwkTs2NP7zlRj2ofEfrpvKGeoFVG6oz4qOUedkNNSd+r/CkQOH2xugoSgB0rZy83u3aIBOmhoesVPUZZRYqbvPoY4BH2o5T+H8=
Received: from DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.138.156) by DBXPR07MB126.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.138.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1005.2; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 03:50:00 +0000
Received: from DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.3.185]) by DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.3.185]) with mapi id 15.01.1005.009; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 03:50:00 +0000
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bal=E1zs_Varga_A?= <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>
To: Norman Finn <norman.finn@mail01.huawei.com>, "detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org" <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: revised architecture draft in github
Thread-Index: AdKn74M6630aUNWUQFWeMk/5MhTDjAATjtyA
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 03:49:59 +0000
Message-ID: <DBXPR07MB1289798176100B7C6B4EC6FAC350@DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <3DF0466E9510274382F5B74499ACD6F8C544C5@dfwpml705-chm.exmail.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <3DF0466E9510274382F5B74499ACD6F8C544C5@dfwpml705-chm.exmail.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: mail01.huawei.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;mail01.huawei.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:67c:370:128:69b5:f546:5c78:1bc1]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DBXPR07MB126; 7:2sCHMIwlCVQ6LYytOYJ2V9grxQ4sc/RlautJttmLjPruNEY/v2keTyveldumEl20u83zPgEbeBOtqjI8jvgsW7hJYI/qosapu2ePWEWvQPnycAuxuBQDjNocET04WDOS24gG1oajFoQqfXGMVqZNKCCn7I+QxlocFY4VkTb+2o97a5qVW6oINUAs+m6fR4//cAf8/ITn/EmAKDPeNME4guImthuHOiQ8FrqGF0syqWvt0i75O/k78ZdPZZLu3rlXp2tf/7A1GgppvjpbQ7p/gGI34G2MUen0STBXvoVDDHOs5ZRxKOTdkIxn2CgSSIBwnk8ew8GQpg41jIAtgh9MVw==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f56d19e4-8912-4c69-d6e0-08d47656acc6
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(201703131423070)(201703031133076)(201702281549070); SRVR:DBXPR07MB126;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DBXPR07MB126AC45D380C04BA34A900DAC350@DBXPR07MB126.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(192374486261705)(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040445)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6041248)(20161123562025)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(20161123558025)(201703131423070)(201702281528070)(201703061421070)(201703061406070)(6072148); SRVR:DBXPR07MB126; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DBXPR07MB126;
x-forefront-prvs: 0261CCEEDF
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(39450400003)(39410400002)(39400400002)(39840400002)(39850400002)(76104003)(377454003)(15374003)(102836003)(6116002)(122556002)(7696004)(74316002)(5660300001)(8936002)(790700001)(8676002)(76176999)(50986999)(9326002)(54356999)(2906002)(3280700002)(81166006)(7736002)(6306002)(9686003)(53546009)(55016002)(86362001)(19609705001)(99286003)(54896002)(6506006)(6246003)(3660700001)(2900100001)(6436002)(2501003)(33656002)(189998001)(229853002)(25786009)(38730400002)(53936002)(2950100002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DBXPR07MB126; H:DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DBXPR07MB1289798176100B7C6B4EC6FAC350DBXPR07MB128eurprd_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Mar 2017 03:49:59.8959 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DBXPR07MB126
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA02SfyzUYRzHPd9fvmduPR3y8WNru/VrCdEvtmbMMk2ltWyXP8qV784tjt0X i1qZzeJaGBLGUIdRhpIZ1XRkin4sMj/OlEPy45ZoFUXco81/78/79X72fN7PHp6W1bLOvFoT L2g1ymg5Z8MUKv5ec5d4Div2T3yhfWqyazmfypfdlD8VrNf/poKbH39iT1PhNkcjhWh1oqD1 9IuwiWorzqTiJgzoynjnHJuClu4hHZLwgA9CXkkvq0M2vAzXI+jPbN0YuhB0981y6ykG36ZB 1+NIQD4F8x8+cmToQPAtY4ZZT3H4GCykf7acsMcXoWGlx+LbYS/o7xxgiO8NuoIa6/+6vi6D ITfshLaWX9S6luJwyKv7YdlPhs9C1+yUxZfgMFjNXabXNcLb4Ofrhxafxo4wNF5KkT4Y9E/f 0UQ7wFfTiqUOwqUIRs3p1gT4QHlZlQUAvkXDbEHBxmuchOoeszUBmQhax0xrKX5tUINx4RDJ hMBkwyAiGSMFzb2jLAGukJWaQxOQw0Jp2vBGf2cY6ctARLvClPEZS/aOhaaKPi4b7S7aVKNo EyqyPMdWeFU4zhDfAwbu5HFEu0Fl+QxNtDsUrBiYzX4Zsq5BDqIgijEq7wMeglZ9SRRjNR4a If4RWvtELxqX3ZvRg5kAA8I8kttKy/RDChmrTBSTYgwIeFpuL10qXrOkkcqkZEEbe0GbEC2I BuTCM3JHqf/z9woZVinjhcuCECdo/1OKlzinoJtd8wMuMJZVEcYOnj+hv2ofKrFLGPWt8gmh jdO+7ccLR7bsCf1zTp0fiIMmw6Z3tDstqoO4DvrG+OL25cP3zadsnSMccqyaWkdqk3O/a+YC x84MvjWp3qh2cS0KYcQv6XqkgzGtGqVWoiBdyRFTwIRT76pVY6fbvruawicDZjkjRim99tJa UfkPySEY/EADAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/WsM7UaqlBFc7mUNlQcdM1G2eSUc>
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] revised architecture draft in github
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 03:50:38 -0000

Hi Norm,
I like the structure now much better. See my comments in the ToC below.
- "3.1.x sections" are more tools to achieve QoS for DetNet, so what about to a second level section.
- "3.2.3. Packet encoding for service protection" does not really connected with the text/sections around it.
- I would change the order of 4.3 and 4.4.
- "5. Compatibility with Layer-2" could be a second level section in section 4.
Cheers
Bala'zs

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     2.1.  Terms used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     2.2.  IEEE 802 TSN to DetNet dictionary . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   3.  Providing the DetNet Quality of Service . . . . . . . . . . .   7
ins> 3.1.  Primary Goals defining the DetNet QoS . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
insert "primary" in title
ins> 3.x.  Tools to achieve the DetNet QoS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
insert new second level section
       3.x.1.  Congestion protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
       3.x.2.  Explicit routes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
       3.x.3.  Jitter Reduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
       3.x.4.  Packet Replication and Elimination  . . . . . . . . .  11
     3.2.  Secondary goals for DetNet  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
       3.2.1.  Coexistence with normal traffic . . . . . . . . . . .  12
       3.2.2.  Fault Mitigation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
???>       3.2.3.  Packet encoding for service protection  . . . . . . .  14
does not fit here really
   4.  DetNet Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
     4.1.  DetNet stack model  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
       4.1.1.  Representative Protocol Stack Model . . . . . . . . .  14
       4.1.2.  DetNet Data Plane Overview  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
       4.1.3.  Network reference model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
     4.2.  DetNet systems  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
       4.2.1.  End system  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
       4.2.2.  DetNet edge, relay, and transit nodes . . . . . . . .  21
>     4.3.  Traffic Engineering for DetNet  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  21
change order of 4.3 and 4.4
       4.3.1.  The Application Plane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  22
       4.3.2.  The Controller Plane  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  22
       4.3.3.  The Network Plane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  23
>     4.4.  DetNet flows  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  24
       4.4.1.  DetNet flow types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  24
       4.4.2.  Source guarantees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  24
       4.4.3.  Incomplete Networks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  26
     4.5.  Queuing, Shaping, Scheduling, and Preemption  . . . . . .  26
     4.6.  Service instance  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  27
     4.7.  Flow identification at technology borders . . . . . . . .  28
       4.7.1.  Exporting flow identification . . . . . . . . . . . .  28
       4.7.2.  Flow attribute mapping between layers . . . . . . . .  29
       4.7.3.  Flow-ID mapping examples  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  30
     4.8.  Advertising resources, capabilities and adjacencies . . .  32
     4.9.  Provisioning model  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  33
       4.9.1.  Centralized Path Computation and Installation . . . .  33
       4.9.2.  Distributed Path Setup  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  33
     4.10. Scaling to larger networks  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  34
     4.11. Connected islands vs. networks  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  34
>   5.  Compatibility with Layer-2  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  34
Move under section 4. as 4.12
   6.  Open Questions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  35
     6.1.  Flat vs. hierarchical control . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  35
     6.2.  Peer-to-peer reservation protocol . . . . . . . . . . . .  35
     6.3.  Wireless media interactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  36
   7.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  36
   8.  Privacy Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  37
   9.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  37
   10. Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  37
   11. Access to IEEE 802.1 documents  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  37
   12. Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  37
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  43



From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:detnet-dp-dt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Norman Finn
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 1:17 PM
To: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
Subject: [Detnet-dp-dt] revised architecture draft in github

Checked in the stuff we talked about.  See what you think.

-- Norm