IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com> Sun, 12 March 2017 22:54 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B12129464 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6FqKS-M704lc for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x232.google.com (mail-pf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEDF4126D74 for <Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id o126so62082860pfb.3 for <Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=LYSVyhDZzKmjlc1wzbAaFpL6P/ZLmfm7UldQ4+O2GFE=; b=Spp5RMlf+nKHmy/+AwxDlVFZEZPK7oP3fMAYzeZCm+/XKHBHDOqGBHAmOqIMb1P2qp hGeRd7W2g/JVL9lCJedyqwrBCSr0nDWEVKaYoD4njFd2cFt9d7o54fDkP2GxObFB2oLS GtUx9T6jKWlriRAhFvm1KT5kspoO/8JBphGS0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=LYSVyhDZzKmjlc1wzbAaFpL6P/ZLmfm7UldQ4+O2GFE=; b=ETb/u490V3SsGe8XujKSD180QZPnH5APrHZq+HAobuWxhRxd+Cqc2cBD8OV1DMrP0k oW03+/cSQon0xeYsWnXIje5mfpUeYNeZKJOeK0ES3nZtZnyk+FW23L0UkK9+e92Lq/V+ 6vVHdOHfXe5NqLDU2G/QDS4v9kY/bab2Qayzx2GvSau/QPsH2crYiU21shsiXF5Voksf r75KTMi7FdTpwYOXjJqNC5GTzCesJG6znFKVWg+9T23y35Bv8gEYcCAY2queyltjdVHE 7rnZvEDc6/BKNvHVOWeWeMs6Z4qaZxb3N4KhzklrdkGT3HOTvrFkvVx7oLWim2DmpEfT B0Bw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39m14sI5ovfOIRokwGbWwS315gWXhK+Anvm3UMOUhYDDrEx0/kd1i4XS4ZCLe26MKyKA
X-Received: by 10.98.28.72 with SMTP id c69mr34246058pfc.8.1489359252071; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.32] (c-24-5-144-221.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.144.221]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k76sm29896156pfg.42.2017.03.12.15.54.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <d0fb128d-89b6-ec51-97ba-42335eedb8a3@ericsson.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:54:09 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <81940808-F98E-4C26-8D3F-474BA056FFD9@broadcom.com>
References: <88BD4A49-3A2C-44DD-A090-E7A3AAC8BF61@broadcom.com> <3eaa6ced-1493-a0da-125f-694567de0107@ericsson.com> <EEF82160-BCA3-4C22-8C81-4D76EC8B9BDB@broadcom.com> <d0fb128d-89b6-ec51-97ba-42335eedb8a3@ericsson.com>
To: Janos Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/_-Fn0plTLqhkDjurK1HTGwM5V34>
Cc: Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 22:54:14 -0000

I see I wrote into the terminology PRER.. later in the text I use PREF (i.e., packet replication and elimination function). I actually prefer the latter since in most cases it fits imho best to the context. I’ll figure out some alignment..

I think you meant 802.1CB and not 802.1CM ;)

- Jouni


-- 
Jouni Korhonen, Broadcom, Core Switching Group
+1-408-391-7160



> On Mar 12, 2017, at 1:26 PM, János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jouni,
> 
> Well, it is just " Packet Replication and Elimination":
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-detnet-architecture-00#section-3.4
> 
> Well, PRE as acronym may be strange.
> 
> If we want to copy the logic of 802.1CM title, then it'd be:
> Packet Replication and Elimination for Reliability (PRER)
> 
> In any case, I think the key is to use packet instead of frame.
> 
> Thanks,
> Janos
> 
> 
> On 3/10/2017 9:22 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>>> I highlighted one thing in the pdw, which I did not implement in the xml:
>>> 
>>> > 
>>> "frame replication and elimination"
>>> 
>>> > 
>>> The architecture document uses "packet replication and elimination", which I think would be better to be used in this doc too; except for he cases when we explicitly refer to 802.1CB.
>>> 
>>> > 
>>> This appears multiple places, another variant: ""frame replication and duplicate elimination".
>>> 
>>> > 
>>> If there is agreement then we could make the change.
>>> 
>> Let’s go for the arch doc way. So “Packet Replication and Elimination for Redundancy” (PREF) ?
>> 
>> - Jouni
>> 
>> 
>> 
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email