Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Solution draft -01 first sketch available
Balázs Varga A <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com> Tue, 25 April 2017 12:08 UTC
Return-Path: <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221EC12EC5D
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=ericsson.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Zsbd4ANGPuxX for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256
bits)) (No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D584912EC5C
for <Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-2b64e98000004efc-bb-58ff3c2b9d64
Received: from ESESSHC011.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.51])
by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id D3.57.20220.B2C3FF85;
Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:08:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUR03-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (153.88.183.145)
by oa.msg.ericsson.com (153.88.183.51) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(TLS) id 14.3.339.0; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:07:58 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=ericsson.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-ericsson-com;
h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version;
bh=eBZZhBaxAfKIMXYW4lQK5cXEuBbbyBcLgRqMaGYLWPE=;
b=CYPGzmYIqPf5qUZjlTF5nOVL5winGURsi+4CbWrTCiJrJ0D9j476HvZjL0sRgVFFhbmCW2o7O0Y6OwhPdv+uIJkSmU0weqdKo8dZEV83uCBKRUUJJb/HeD56wmUjAbUlYT13HBo2qQ6HJsqOBFrBFDE8/G5P9wxMlpAXL5/GB5s=
Received: from DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.138.156) by
DBXPR07MB127.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.138.154) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id
15.1.1061.6; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:07:56 +0000
Received: from DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.3.178]) by
DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.3.178]) with mapi id
15.01.1061.010; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:07:56 +0000
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bal=E1zs_Varga_A?= <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>
To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>, "Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org"
<Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Detnet-dp-dt] Solution draft -01 first sketch available
Thread-Index: AQHSt8pgLuTKRNkVPkm8uMo23q4o0aHWB+9w
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:07:56 +0000
Message-ID: <DBXPR07MB1288BCAE4AFEBFE0E9A1D1AAC1E0@DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <9C75E07B-C613-449B-ABCA-8C1A2316C8E2@broadcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <9C75E07B-C613-449B-ABCA-8C1A2316C8E2@broadcom.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: broadcom.com; dkim=none (message not signed)
header.d=none;broadcom.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [195.50.183.210]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DBXPR07MB127;
7:cZYHS53i7umkiObLq99FifdDcuAwqYSh0y5uH1RJtxYnh/i1mJIWOpkqoMxmqxenWjuzvlc3+lNh2PZ6ya9p0lkF5SzGh7+FEP2nCr6jmMCzbVA9jDxgejc8gGBgNqUwmSrl98/WutkzbHRqUzV9W6hJvvrgltuWKWF5NT7OMd8A3m6zpJ+X+M5v5KJBwjxwJ9iBBeu2YfWkIVf3doPISVZnwfirh20HQ9wlytU8HHY72y1SBPavuWF9XDUMPXGEuOoF8PznWnpWwNsvA7Oha0sH2ZpoAahdYwO34XDgjHQosQcCZSpvFVCEhaNgtWYuhgwzLbYlGwTbQ1UQN5698g==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3a713f8a-5b4b-42a0-b800-08d48bd3b558
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0;
RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075);
SRVR:DBXPR07MB127;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DBXPR07MB12732DD987D060D8CC558F1AC1E0@DBXPR07MB127.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0;
RULEID:(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(6041248)(20161123558100)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123564025)(20161123560025)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(6072148);
SRVR:DBXPR07MB127; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DBXPR07MB127;
x-forefront-prvs: 0288CD37D9
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;
SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(39450400003)(39850400002)(39860400002)(39840400002)(39400400002)(39410400002)(51914003)(13464003)(50986999)(76176999)(53546009)(25786009)(33656002)(54356999)(122556002)(2900100001)(230783001)(189998001)(81166006)(8676002)(8936002)(66066001)(229853002)(5660300001)(6436002)(6506006)(7736002)(2906002)(305945005)(3660700001)(6116002)(102836003)(3846002)(74316002)(3280700002)(2950100002)(9686003)(7696004)(6306002)(55016002)(99286003)(86362001)(38730400002)(6246003)(53936002)(2501003);
DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DBXPR07MB127;
H:DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Apr 2017 12:07:56.0873 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DBXPR07MB127
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmphleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGbHdWFfb5n+Ewf8PwharJqxls3j4JcGB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Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/_LNR7y_cMt-wIdmLuzgYX8V6PcA>
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Solution draft -01 first sketch available
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>,
<mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>,
<mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:08:15 -0000
Hi Jouni, thanks for the edit. I have some comments below. Cheers Bala'zs
1, General comment: on Flow identification for OAM purposes
Many months ago we have discussed some troubleshooting scenario, where
it was necessary on a link to being able to distinguish which DetNet
packet belongs to which sub-flow of a compound flow. Using a Flow-ID
being part of the PW encapsulation that was easy to fulfill. Now it is
removed and furthermore we expect to use the same PW-label at elimination
points for sub-flows.
Example:
sub-flow1: A --> D
sub-flow2: B --> D
So on link C-D we can NOT distinguish packets of the two sub-flow.
A--+
\
C-----D
/
B--+
Do we intend to use the "Topology overlay Label" in such scenarios?
Any thoughts? Should we add text regarding this?
2, Specific comments:
- 16 bits seqnum + editors note: as per my memory we have concluded
that limited buffer size of nodes obsoletes the issue with high speed
links? Have I missed something?
- IPv6 flow label (text after figure 6.):
"IPv6 is the only supported IP transport and the intermediate routers
SHOULD use the IPv6 header Flow Label for the DetNet flow
identification. The DetNet aware end hosts MUST program the IPv6
header Flow Label with a value that identifies the end to end DetNet
flow (together with the destination address)."
I think there is a typo, text should speak about src and not dst address.
A flow can be uniquely identified by the "IPv6 src address + Flow label",
where the IPv6 src address is the IPv6 address of the DetNet source node
(in case of DetNet aware end host). Just based on the IPv6 flow label
intermediate nodes can NOT identify a DetNet flow unless IPv6 flow label
is unique.
- Figure 6 vs. figure 7:
What is the added information here? I see no difference between the figures.
- Section 7.3. Time synchronization:
In case of "PTP packets are sent as a normal DetNet flow" it would be worth
note that some of the DetNet functions (like specific queuing methods) can not
be applied due to the lack of sync between the nodes.
For the "Time-as-a-service" case I have found somewhat confusing that accurate
time is provided also for the intermediate nodes. I would assume all nodes in
the DetNet domain are in sync in this scenario and participating in PTP. Have
I missed something?
-----Original Message-----
From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:detnet-dp-dt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen
Sent: 2017. április 18. 0:31
To: Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
Subject: [Detnet-dp-dt] Solution draft -01 first sketch available
Folks,
I pushed the latest edits to the repository.
- Jouni
--
Jouni Korhonen, Broadcom, Core Switching Group
+1-408-391-7160
_______________________________________________
Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt
- [Detnet-dp-dt] Solution draft -01 first sketch av… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Solution draft -01 first sketc… Balázs Varga A
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Solution draft -01 first sketc… Balázs Varga A