IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github

Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com> Sat, 11 March 2017 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C811294B5 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:35:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.321
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.321 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F8ZjKqexdHbv for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:35:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5A7C12943F for <Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:35:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO LHREML713-CAH.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DIR58581; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:35:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.71) by LHREML713-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:35:22 +0000
Received: from SZXEMA506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.67]) by SZXEMA412-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.71]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 20:35:11 +0800
From: Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>, Janos Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github
Thread-Index: AQHSmVqTEKB38ki26UeLfgpxI6XKHKGN1/qAgAAnTACAAZS2IA==
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:35:10 +0000
Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68BBAB1B250@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <88BD4A49-3A2C-44DD-A090-E7A3AAC8BF61@broadcom.com> <3eaa6ced-1493-a0da-125f-694567de0107@ericsson.com> <EEF82160-BCA3-4C22-8C81-4D76EC8B9BDB@broadcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <EEF82160-BCA3-4C22-8C81-4D76EC8B9BDB@broadcom.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.74.203.119]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020204.58C3EF0B.01C4, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.4.67, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 3b458698e2cbcedbfb0236db4bb90e0d
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/d3hRjlsDUVZ7uxq4g-L_6BKR8TM>
Cc: "Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org" <Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:35:28 -0000

"Packet Replication and Elimination for Redundancy" (PRER) , it seems PRER makes more sense in MPLS than FRER.

Cheers,
Yuanlong

-----Original Message-----
From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:detnet-dp-dt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2017 4:23 AM
To: Janos Farkas
Cc: Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github

Thanks.

> On Mar 10, 2017, at 10:01 AM, János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jouni,
> 
> I've made some changes to the draft. The attached pdf indicates them.
> I've updated the xml version where you moved Balazs' text to be main text. I hope i did not mess xml versioning.
> (the commented pdf is one version earlier)

Nope. I rebased my ongoing edits to yours so everything is fine. Nothing git cannot do ;)


> Well, I did not make any dramatic change.
> I'd highlight two:
> a) replaced "data plane protocol" with "data plane solution". We are working on solution as reflected by "sol" in the file name ;-). I mean, a protocol is rather above the data plane, e.g., in the control plane.
> b) replaced "domain" with alternatives. DetNet is for single domain. Actually, domain is an overloaded term: administrative domain, etc., better to avoid.

Ack.

> I highlighted one thing in the pdw, which I did not implement in the xml:
> "frame replication and elimination"
> The architecture document uses "packet replication and elimination", which I think would be better to be used in this doc too; except for he cases when we explicitly refer to 802.1CB.
> This appears multiple places, another variant: ""frame replication and duplicate elimination".
> If there is agreement then we could make the change.

Let’s go for the arch doc way. So “Packet Replication and Elimination for Redundancy” (PREF) ?

- Jouni


> 
> Regards,
> Janos
> 
> 
> On 3/10/2017 5:55 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>> Folks,
>> 
>> I did quite a bit of updates to the draft. All in GitHub. I’ll continue writing over the weekend etc..
>> 
>> - Jouni
>> 
>> 
> 
> <draft-dt-detnet-dp-sol-00 - 2017-03-10-JF-comments.pdf>

_______________________________________________
Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email