Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] LFIB proposals

Thanks Loa, your conversion to LFIB is quite useful. I'm struggling a
bit to follow up and check all the entries (not sure if it is because
of potential typos or because I'm just tired), but I'll wait to see if
the next call helps me with that.

BTW, it would be good if we have the text and "your slide 7" in one
single doc, and that the slide shows all the nodes and labels
(including the stuff marked as "*" in your document), for completeness.

Thanks,

Carlos

On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 22:35 +0800, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> I talked Yuanlong earlier today, and we agreed do work a bit on
> "each 
> others slides and texts". Yuanlong agreed to do the label stacks for
> "my
> slide 7" and I agreed convert "my slide 7" to an LFIB. That text is 
> included. Given what I said earlier there needs to be some (a lot of)
> proof reading done, b ut I think the idea is clear.
> 
> One odd thing is that I've been going towards that we don't need the
> L-level labels, when doing the LFIB I'm less convinced that we can do
> without them. It turns out that what Stewart Bryant has been talking
> about over the last year "MPLS labels as instructions", L-labels are
> (among other things) an instruction to do or not to do replication/
> elimination.
> 
> Sorry I've not had time to look at multicast.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
> Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt