IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Detnet-dp-dt] thoughts from the 1st DT call

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com> Wed, 04 January 2017 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D06312945B for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 12:51:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wHQhKIOEtYZE for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 12:51:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22a.google.com (mail-pf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78B87129587 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 12:51:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 127so3949282pfg.1 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 12:51:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=8KZbeFpYwc1j43Eo3bbCtSEsCT1I5NjncqekAHXh13g=; b=IgX6vPZj1/GqIE+pYcfrRZavfWE75Sg3++qxl/4xhKS20Dx5tIFPE+zgWhTuVTZXeL 9Z1d/JQKnE0q0XPoL+1r1vVsu/s8g9kQw/HhHX3OdP8Uoit9zSyE9X1T/hIzoDNv3+cm qUc2mlPOkNfZu8a3BJuY+tWgWtiUiW6VeELdI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=8KZbeFpYwc1j43Eo3bbCtSEsCT1I5NjncqekAHXh13g=; b=TkFn3NKyhaJS3tfWqsrUCxDfLsgQNLKNyIv03/34gODuu8xEjw0qSKEixj1QBHp58P 6Oijlei8W+CkSDCQHXQSDXbGE4o+wh/9Td1TJwvxSLhJIg9qgqQibQ3zuZDxDMdqGSmT hTxMoMIGEfT8tglfCNJBQJUhT1KPVCxRcIreg7k3GSq7Xd5YxYABQuo2MfC5wLQfu4Gl aX9t+fpaY/qsotusj9nH+VlkkxkFAvI6AEwXsjpUFIojJjbtWvw4etrWEGVRGJcyqPh7 VmeqvOczmlF4ZWE+0baiM8k8MLEiIWqi9P97zxeNhp4Ie0hETlDcfjBOPnA9t0Kx5Uvj qNTw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXID9WZdbdcYEUhBEeoH1GVpJxSxXcmVkw1NGr1mwFJmHlFAQLdGDzP0TeTthUYWi6et
X-Received: by 10.84.133.99 with SMTP id 90mr149144968plf.151.1483563115290; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 12:51:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcpe2-sj1-004.sj.broadcom.com ([216.31.219.19]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f3sm72749180pga.1.2017.01.04.12.51.54 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Jan 2017 12:51:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Message-Id: <097528F0-0035-4650-8473-776BE666E025@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 12:52:05 -0800
To: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/jNA4j9BKfH_Fj4YnpnBcF1gcDBM>
Subject: [Detnet-dp-dt] thoughts from the 1st DT call
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 20:51:58 -0000

We had a well attended call last night: Jouni, Tal, Carlos, Janos, Balazs, Loa, Yuanlong.

First, send me your github account names, so that I can add you to the upcoming repository.

We have calls if we have things to discuss. Jouni will inform about whether the call takes place or not latest during the preceding weekend. We will have a call next week.

After all the management related discussions we managed to scratch the surface on two topics. First, Balazs brought up the topic how much nodes in the network need to understand detnet flows. This was in the context of using PW labels to identify the flow and it can be an issue i.e., the node in the path has to look into the label stack to identify the flow, while the same could be achieved using other methods as well. Is plain outer label-based forwarding OK in some nodes? Second, Jouni brought up a similar topic in the context of FRER. It implies the node doing FRER would need to do quite a bit of work within the label stack, and it needs to be decided whether we aim doing such operations only at the edges of the network/detnet domain or also within the detnet domain.

List of background material to be collected. I would suggest taking a quick look at IEEE 802.1TSN specs (specifically 802.1CB and 802.1CM). Feel free to fill in more documents that you think are essential to understand.

Mailstones - first phase:
* End of Jan - have fundamental decisions of the high level solution directions agreed.
* End of Feb - DT internal -00 publication ready. This can be a rather barebones version, though.

- Jouni

--
Jouni Korhonen, Broadcom Ltd.
M: +1-408-391-7160

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email