[Detnet-dp-dt] DetNet drafts
Norman Finn <norman.finn@mail01.huawei.com> Thu, 06 April 2017 22:30 UTC
Return-Path: <norman.finn@mail01.huawei.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9B3129498
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 15:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id gflNm2M1nDrd for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 6 Apr 2017 15:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrg12-dlp.huawei.com (dfwrg12-dlp.huawei.com [206.16.17.16])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 357C312945E
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 15:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfwpml703-chm.exmail.huawei.com)
([172.18.9.243])
by dfwrg12-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued)
with ESMTP id BBK83233; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 17:30:06 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from DFWPML704-CHM.exmail.huawei.com (10.124.31.208) by
dfwpml703-chm.exmail.huawei.com (10.124.31.135) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 15:30:06 -0700
Received: from DFWPML702-CHM.exmail.huawei.com ([169.254.5.94]) by
DFWPML704-CHM.exmail.huawei.com ([169.254.1.218]) with mapi id
14.03.0301.000; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 15:30:02 -0700
From: Norman Finn <norman.finn@mail01.huawei.com>
To: "detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org" <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: DetNet drafts
Thread-Index: AQHSryVUw9E9fIA4Pk2EBtzqDTjN2g==
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 22:30:01 +0000
Message-ID: <3DF0466E9510274382F5B74499ACD6F8C5A316@dfwpml702-chm.exmail.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.18.4.33]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_3DF0466E9510274382F5B74499ACD6F8C5A316dfwpml702chmexmai_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/jOZTYX_djuvUBBeK8ZOpcs_UmIg>
Subject: [Detnet-dp-dt] DetNet drafts
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>,
<mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>,
<mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 22:30:10 -0000
We're actively working on a minor update to the architecture draft, which should be done, soon. Questions: Has the data plane solutions draft superseded the data plane alternatives draft? Is someone going to renew the alternative draft? (I don't plan to.) I'd be glad to update the problem statement. It could use a few little tweaks. I like it because it explains why you can't use the usual congestion control mechanisms. Shall I do so? -- Norm
- [Detnet-dp-dt] DetNet drafts Norman Finn