IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com> Sat, 11 March 2017 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DCFC12957A for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:30:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fURJ53tMIaqr for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:30:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x233.google.com (mail-pf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C46C012957B for <Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:30:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id o126so54041061pfb.3 for <Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:30:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=W5NFARSUnHv+XFAYWD5XzFbnIOyAXQ/jy5YgasXpLW0=; b=Xz8It205PDqnjhDGql2QEF23umrGBgX1cuvJwwpiJEpDmc1yNJwGZjUHlCuaJpje8K P4WCD5NQkWyrGpDlcaxPUyy2xK2L8evvNpDR8Tc3nF8icy7GiVgvx6hmMAOveVzXcydD 6C1ftKrZ49fR8UXzvV4ohpmwMJVyhSr3mGBWA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=W5NFARSUnHv+XFAYWD5XzFbnIOyAXQ/jy5YgasXpLW0=; b=WIOmpCYvYDNcPzGrg/eTFsMfeCSCRPA14m4myp0yXwTJue1iaPZApAcos9IigpF04z F+1JclL7wad7Bn+16PrP3PqqQH2l/VnZnNlKNa2gBAgNl1J15rcNGd5VBeJ55qZ56KN9 jO5hH67vVBueE0hUOf7vh3+ymtlFs5dHlzC1C68lM14J6j9fvtVBL199TQbAh28/o8MQ ZPq4o3BNhFyQIFIZWX7rGR3mKCMA8N0ErzsyOWB8ZjxR7w9IfR6e5kX9R2+NCg2xhIxA rsfFIYbW9o1n+nCEoojLJnks6P+D62Bdczszem7FizdQ1QYFxPnugE8OotkifLhcjSQr SRgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39l7jfRa9xT8rAJoTfE8JYOqMTg2yWnk+CTzuqUBK8q8TmMUAjaV0U2BjKK4YN2wUVyv
X-Received: by 10.98.103.75 with SMTP id b72mr28827581pfc.105.1489260652145; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:30:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4200:e520:cdc9:ae40:bbe0:e02d? ([2601:647:4200:e520:cdc9:ae40:bbe0:e02d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z74sm25462365pfd.70.2017.03.11.11.30.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:30:51 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <1489235570.4666.2.camel@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:30:50 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <17CD9B62-5A8A-48CC-A6C5-9729CA22CCD1@broadcom.com>
References: <88BD4A49-3A2C-44DD-A090-E7A3AAC8BF61@broadcom.com> <3eaa6ced-1493-a0da-125f-694567de0107@ericsson.com> <1489235570.4666.2.camel@it.uc3m.es>
To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/jg9WwTV2wieadwdhAMcnrhBurqI>
Cc: Janos Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com>, Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Draft update in github
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 19:30:54 -0000

I think I changed domains to networks in places Janos pointed out.. I might have missed few, though.

- Jouni


-- 
Jouni Korhonen, Broadcom, Core Switching Group
+1-408-391-7160



> On Mar 11, 2017, at 4:32 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> wrote:
> 
> Hi János,
> 
> Just one comment about "domain" below. 
> 
> On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 19:01 +0100, János Farkas wrote:
>> Hi Jouni,
>> 
>> I've made some changes to the draft. The attached pdf indicates them.
>> I've updated the xml version where you moved Balazs' text to be main 
>> text. I hope i did not mess xml versioning.
>> (the commented pdf is one version earlier)
>> 
>> Well, I did not make any dramatic change.
>> I'd highlight two:
>> a) replaced "data plane protocol" with "data plane solution". We are 
>> working on solution as reflected by "sol" in the file name ;-). I
>> mean, 
>> a protocol is rather above the data plane, e.g., in the control
>> plane.
>> b) replaced "domain" with alternatives. DetNet is for single domain. 
>> Actually, domain is an overloaded term: administrative domain, etc., 
>> better to avoid.
> 
> I agree with you. I made some editorial changes before to align with
> the draft-ietf-detnet-architecture document, where "DetNet domain" is
> used. But I've checked again and it's true that domain is merely used
> in the terminology section and not really in the text. Norm, maybe you
> can consider removing "DetNet domain" from the arch document
> (terminology section) so both docs are consistent.
> 
> I'm reviewing the draft. I'll soon send some updates (I expect them to
> be just minor things/editorial).
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Carlos
> 
>> 
>> I highlighted one thing in the pdw, which I did not implement in the
>> xml:
>> "frame replication and elimination"
>> The architecture document uses "packet replication and elimination", 
>> which I think would be better to be used in this doc too; except for
>> he 
>> cases when we explicitly refer to 802.1CB.
>> This appears multiple places, another variant: ""frame replication
>> and 
>> duplicate elimination".
>> If there is agreement then we could make the change.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Janos
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/10/2017 5:55 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>> 
>>> I did quite a bit of updates to the draft. All in GitHub. I’ll
>>> continue writing over the weekend etc..
>>> 
>>> - Jouni
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
>> Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email