Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] New update of the draft available

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com> Sun, 12 March 2017 23:44 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9E012940C for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n38KUQ1T-iX0 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x231.google.com (mail-pg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89A05128E19 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x231.google.com with SMTP id g2so39646843pge.3 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=AZWd+EWIOhOPGyOnsfaXjcoxS7S9ofLVooOkPWrguSA=; b=LdPYQtVOQGDNLoyOpLeTGL8CTccCVOTlOAhJ8/7KNZ0q/wvPK09JDHqW4fEmQQPn8z 7vSSNQ9+vodhhajSrjKZrBU9xHuj9yMcFf0DHZy7KstMKtw61xV+1KrcqdY0RVmrx6cQ lb7WH8bs1M9pIbo3+69tvaCRy/X0NaZXfQawk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=AZWd+EWIOhOPGyOnsfaXjcoxS7S9ofLVooOkPWrguSA=; b=YOE1crSBhIB/VC9IzgGwgL0vIGiXSNob5jwTHuO89CN3rM8gxexPHSfO0C9agkeuWX gCNymznrC1AVRGMbpAIJxtA783SwPgG912NoatIn4zKGssM7nyMgKX+MhHdmbaOFCSBM HIVlUlhS4Sw55lKw09EBJOGgGr+diHV5dxk9sy34vOoTB0SgQvRHlQhmejzrUbVvCPtl Rfx/JqOTuIQLbJL4TubHuP23aRr4+lxAMJJ6BMI5dpekx8sTtoKAYeyJDZ62xB8+O7/M cp68/+u5eqRZx22Anv/g622h7Hi/zVEscJxUAm1T85pFjObg5HJ696tJNmmfAI5whMAZ /NtA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39l2GAfNPLal71hKXxU3yQTybD9hSd4ihasbf+tSJmW9Z11GN1zmErjYip8eElo2xk0R
X-Received: by 10.84.168.69 with SMTP id e63mr42966481plb.124.1489362264992; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4200:e520:91d:c678:f493:a25c? ([2601:647:4200:e520:91d:c678:f493:a25c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p77sm29927561pfj.99.2017.03.12.16.44.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <45bccdbf-2457-2c08-34fe-c559a80e9c7d@pi.nu>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:44:23 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2A3C3B8D-742F-4E49-B3B7-1DBA49BB6BC0@broadcom.com>
References: <C0EC6F12-4028-4360-A6BB-BFEE3C253EA3@broadcom.com> <45bccdbf-2457-2c08-34fe-c559a80e9c7d@pi.nu>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/mzEKDm5Ae0FIyHr1R4crsVzhOB8>
Cc: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] New update of the draft available
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 23:44:27 -0000

I think there’s still a bit of confusion what constitutes T and L labels. Say I have a topology below:


          DA-T-PE     P       P       Php      DA-S-PE       Php    DA-T-PE
PW label     200      200     200     200    200 swp 300     300    300
L label
T label          123  swp 124 swp 125 pop                131 pop

Why would I need L-labels in the above case?

          DA-T-PE     P       P       Php      DA-S-PE       Php    DA-T-PE
PW label     200      200     200     200         200        200    200
L label      300      300     300     300    300 swp 400     400    400
T label          123  swp 124 swp 125 pop                131 pop

Here I could use the L-label to bypass DA-S-PE.

Correct me if this is not correct assumption..


- Jouni




> On Mar 10, 2017, at 6:38 PM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
> 
> Jouni,
> 
> Mostly looks very good, the thing I don't understand is why you still say that the L-label is optional, it really isn't.
> 
> - we need it to deliver the d-pw label unchanged
> - since we can't guarantee that the "P" nodes are not able to do
>  DetNet NSP, we can't set up the d-pw label with signaling that
>  exposes the "request for DetNet NSP/FRER" to P nodes.
> - needed for protection
> - the end-to-end tunnel must be the innermost tunnel, carrying
>  pw label
> 
> There is one case, if two DA-*-PEs are immediately adjacent, there the
> L-lable will be an implicit NULL label and not appear in the stack, but
> for the control plane it is there.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> On 2017-03-11 07:25, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>> * Added Loa’s comments on the L-label.
>> * Added Janos’ comments.
>> * Added extended forwarder text.
>> * Added (speculative text.. can be removed) D bit to flow-id word so that we can check in a ring case the direction of the flow (note this does not double history buffer space as claimed.. did not bother to fix that)
>> * reworked the PW encapsulation pictures.
>> * Added more content to DA-*-PE descriptions.
>> 
>> - Jouni
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
> Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt