Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Updates to dp-sol

Balázs Varga A <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com> Mon, 29 May 2017 12:13 UTC

Return-Path: <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE958129548 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 May 2017 05:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u6Ob6NRKlbQx for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 May 2017 05:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDF72127137 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 May 2017 05:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-35fff700000055fe-61-592c10517216
Received: from ESESSHC005.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.33]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 06.AC.22014.1501C295; Mon, 29 May 2017 14:13:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUR02-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (153.88.183.145) by oa.msg.ericsson.com (153.88.183.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.339.0; Mon, 29 May 2017 14:13:06 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-ericsson-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=dhgAOJJs51QgKsAAhZ1rcSBMV3H47ywb7cchSvdrI2s=; b=iHx70/CVHJAf3I4ci/rP1cq1ymx3MvqSzMUMJ+hlWup3rz5+dbINga+42+MfdmnvgTfu5WnUYQO6saCq1KPxc0e93/g6RAZpUeH7GgMRQz5U4+u3fsJsjd+rkasg//GUfG5UoMQi3fEkJyXMTUyfMJpziTJ7kSD4LV4qbnyfLG8=
Received: from DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.138.156) by DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.138.156) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1124.5; Mon, 29 May 2017 12:13:03 +0000
Received: from DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e46d:cba7:2281:8afe]) by DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e46d:cba7:2281:8afe%27]) with mapi id 15.01.1124.016; Mon, 29 May 2017 12:13:03 +0000
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bal=E1zs_Varga_A?= <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>
To: Norman Finn <norman.finn@mail01.huawei.com>, "detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org" <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Updates to dp-sol
Thread-Index: AdLWe+ZNrEwhMukURuyl8l+vnLNXDgB9kGWQ
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 12:13:03 +0000
Message-ID: <DBXPR07MB128019938C9C075E6959FD1ACF30@DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <3DF0466E9510274382F5B74499ACD6F8C75E1E@dfwpml702-chm.exmail.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <3DF0466E9510274382F5B74499ACD6F8C75E1E@dfwpml702-chm.exmail.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: mail01.huawei.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;mail01.huawei.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [91.82.100.59]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DBXPR07MB128; 7:t/gkKsusOm97zbz61iTpR4lwy6gMgADQRGoAyISgDENDvYII/i74GQ+jmKKC21vZP110dG1GI8z/EWLnHiwnw6iqPbfsNLxgrCdZLeNINkYlGvxKv1V1EbQUoOlgL7rdlMiQtMJlROHTNkW3Er4OEcGmoSIGweFDftEtzPZNVELLKifY3dcY+kx4R7/Ov8YM9h6E/DDE8YsLf+uJ+z8LqrrGrEg2ij1dcCYONVPl05lbTVypJamZgTN2BgnIjMl3B6XHxrd8A6JMfBz09UgdOAHFJy96vppBJWaDcma4uTHeD32gnZajrmw2Tc83t/9fDLHho+GWo63Zrv5MO+VvgQ==
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DBXPR07MB128:
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 860cab70-5c47-40e2-9eac-08d4a68c0e54
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075); SRVR:DBXPR07MB128;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DBXPR07MB1284E69C90665DFF89AF379ACF30@DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700073)(100105000095)(100000701073)(100105300095)(100000702073)(100105100095)(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(100000703073)(100105400095)(6041248)(20161123562025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558100)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(6072148)(100000704073)(100105200095)(100000705073)(100105500095); SRVR:DBXPR07MB128; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800073)(100110000095)(100000801073)(100110300095)(100000802073)(100110100095)(100000803073)(100110400095)(100000804073)(100110200095)(100000805073)(100110500095); SRVR:DBXPR07MB128;
x-forefront-prvs: 0322B4EDE1
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(39840400002)(39400400002)(39410400002)(39450400003)(39850400002)(39860400002)(53754006)(6436002)(6506006)(7110500001)(33656002)(5660300001)(38730400002)(6246003)(9686003)(102836003)(99286003)(76176999)(53936002)(50986999)(53546009)(55016002)(790700001)(25786009)(6116002)(3846002)(6306002)(54896002)(54356999)(2900100001)(189998001)(7696004)(74316002)(229853002)(2950100002)(3280700002)(7736002)(3660700001)(9326002)(2906002)(2420400007)(15650500001)(19609705001)(66066001)(86362001)(478600001)(10710500007)(5250100002)(8936002)(14454004)(2501003)(8676002)(81166006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DBXPR07MB128; H:DBXPR07MB128.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DBXPR07MB128019938C9C075E6959FD1ACF30DBXPR07MB128eurprd_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 May 2017 12:13:03.0371 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DBXPR07MB128
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA02Sa0iTYRTHe97LfDcaPS3Nw8ouAz94NxORkMoiECqJ0rxQ1Mw3Xem0TS2j D0MzbMOplZJmzWQaDkudiabLbChWSmaGeOlmamiWQgZ5CcvXx8Bvv/P/n3M453A4WmZh5ZxK ncJr1MoEhUjCFEU2bPc6hj2jfMv0dKAl76EosKK9k9pLhZjNc1RIY91n9ggVLQmK5RNUabzG Z/dpSXx+j4FNblddKh+/6qBDNSf0SMwB9oeByieUHnGcDLchEFCyhC8Q1JfMi4SAwTk02L4U IuIUUtBtz2JJMIzgWdMDWmglwgdgJntYJLAjjoHaxS5G4A14C8zUzDFE3wodHy00YT/4mzXP CsxgV3htrF2uleJoaGvVIYFlOAxaqspEwnhiHA66yUOCjPBG+P2qihKYxs4wOGqiyDYYzLZu mrATTIwsLs+JsAnBp6lsB2JsA2vp9Aq7wFuTYXkzwAYabsyWrHRyg4HsiZVOh2HkmokiSUYE d+aGEDFUMPWreaVgF2Tnd7AkqZWF3ntTLDE2w93pdgdijLGQMZrJkrvI4cO76ygPuRWv2oNw Etj1t0TFy+dYDy+LRhmie0N/AdFp7AEV9ydpwl5we9HOrNZLkYMFOWl5bUxinN9Ob16jOqPV Jqm91XyKFS190PPHC66NqPd7sB1hDinWSvcjzygZq0zTpifaEXC0wlE6NOIRJZPGKtMv85qk U5rUBF5rR5s4RuEsDW55EynDccoU/jzPJ/Oa/y7FieU6tAf7/+nb5+I4ZDl3tKHBucO3y+o+ u65zrMkYEJRjZsYng4YD+kzHT/4YLpJf0UWIk36Gb680TxZUa/pLb9aFynVxEpcL/kOjPs1r Sp4OVvd4+ucuhFtsqYG2r7n9qZ6ZsdZvtWkV5WZjXn2upGUGQh/hi41FVkPEezojrPvgWQWj jVfucKc1WuU/WIRH2D0DAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/pG-py8fLjp45Q4IymOHPo1XQ0CU>
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] Updates to dp-sol
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 12:13:11 -0000

Hi All,

A general observation: we may need a new structure for the draft.

In the first discussions we have concluded to use practically the same encapsulation for the DetNet flows namely PseudoWires.
So we were able to use the MS-PW analogy to describe the DetNet data plane. Practically all statements were valid for both
PSN types (i) IP and (ii) MPLS.

However, in Chicago based on the feedbacks and our discussions we have changed the proposed data plane using (i) native
encapsulation in case of IPv6 and (ii) using PW in case of MPLS. This is something we have to reflect in the text.

There are numerous examples where we refer explicitly to PWs, making confusion with respect to scenarios where PSN = IPv6.
One good example for that is the definition of PREF in the terminology section:
   PREF          A Packet Replication and Elimination Function (PREF)
                 does the replication and elimination processig of
                 DetNet flow packets in DA-T-PE or DA-S-PE nodes.  The
                 replication function is essentially the existing 1+1
                 protection mechanism.  The elimination function reuses
                 and extends the existing [RFC3985] PseudoWire
                 sequencing provided duplicate detection mechanism to
                 operate over multiple (separate) PseudoWires that are
                 sub-flows of a compound DetNet flow.
This text is not valid for IPv6. And there are many similar examples all over in the document. I have found practically problematic
text in each chapter. Including Abstract, Introduction, etc. etc.

So, should we reconsider the structure? Any thoughts?

Cheers
Bala'zs

From: Detnet-dp-dt [mailto:detnet-dp-dt-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Norman Finn
Sent: 2017. május 27. 1:58
To: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
Subject: [Detnet-dp-dt] Updates to dp-sol

I've checked in an updated draft-dt-detnet-dp-sol-01.  Changes:

 - Fixed a few typos/spelling.

 - Expanded introduction to include IPv6 encaps.

 - Edited time section.  It assumed that PTP is normally a DetNet flow, and I claim that that is not the normal case, at all.  Also, the first choice (now the second) needed a little clarification.

 - Added sentence in bidirectional about no special bidirectional feature except for same path.

 - Small edit to Class of Service.

 - Added 7.6 Layer 2 addressing considerations.

 - Added 802.1Q to references.

 - Added myself to authors list.

All of the above are, IMO, covered by what we talked about on Tuesday except maybe the introduction (which should be non-controversial) and the synchronization stuff (which could conceivably be controversial).  Feel free to challenge what you don't like, of course.

-- Norm