Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] check the dp dt draft "comment style"..

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 31 August 2017 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62921132344 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D5fs9hndKc59 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.33.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 064DD1321AE for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw3 (unknown [10.0.90.84]) by gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D4C1AB439 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 12:25:59 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw3 with id 3uRw1w00P2SSUrH01uRzh8; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 12:25:59 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=F98nTupN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=KeKAF7QvOSUA:10 a=Vcx1vdevMb3hUGIjZwcA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=9dHqXpzUXG0mExU9vL6GuHS9gy+vxByBFYJxz2snCEQ=; b=BEhML34upaVskBWDvNPH2UXtnB 4cxo9nYLDNbgpahtRfcyz/eCot0xGBQSQ3oVEVpjfsF+oivuOh/eV168GWDhyRILPDJk0UDnE0G3t 0ATPZA8Kf2xawAtCTbrOm6l6g;
Received: from pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.84.20]:42782 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1dnUA8-001NQE-1g for detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 12:25:56 -0600
To: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
References: <081401d31f81$ad2b88b0$07829a10$@gmail.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <f0ef6e9d-ccde-397f-9acf-142b6ff452af@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:25:46 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <081401d31f81$ad2b88b0$07829a10$@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.84.20
X-Exim-ID: 1dnUA8-001NQE-1g
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.84.20]:42782
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 4
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/tLxvHyIQf9sdStdzPQRFM3IpPQc>
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] check the dp dt draft "comment style"..
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 18:26:01 -0000

Hi Jouni,

    I don't see the comment that "EVPN encapsulation should be
considered as an alternative to PWs" captured.  Perhaps before or after
comment 3.

Lou

On 8/27/2017 6:13 PM, Jouni wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Check the initial test with comments included (only abstract & intro so
> far). Is the style OK or do you want some other arrangement for the
> comments? Now they follow closely Stewart's review on the mailing list. We
> could group comments at the end of each section also? 
>
> Comments? Preferences?
>
> - Jouni
>
>
>
> This body part will be downloaded on demand.