IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] a quick look at the replication/discarding case for detnet flows

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com> Sat, 21 January 2017 02:47 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F8412965C for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:47:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vA4M_egIxFoF for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:47:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x231.google.com (mail-pf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30E3312965B for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:47:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id f144so26643120pfa.2 for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:47:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=XsdcqEphDwJYt5XBmlolAxCOU4jRGV0xM0tzW6ZJgsc=; b=Zs+WbWOIftSyUzV/CRGR7jEeTrB8yiZN3G5s68UWWAlHNmPVg4JfOizC5stBvHTiB0 BXwV1YfyK67091sZnJz91ZuxclTJj2MHuleZQxXN2HuIiY6eaFKIA19YqP2rdQ/1PJuK VZLR3P+uV5r8xR4nObNyVt16qu1OPr5fp2Zvo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=XsdcqEphDwJYt5XBmlolAxCOU4jRGV0xM0tzW6ZJgsc=; b=VvOuI3hfp+44WdaZMcS2gDGSJlRVH9j7tOT8lipDyNpjxDcGxJWatPRmteQExBso02 fkr3YBx9bf34TA/C/13qXoaDXdociwd6CJoj/IgbZXQHwq2WzHQXTyEy3EHm8yw+FWAh /E8oMvPr39TQhFHXxCbtTubcWcaq1KQ2EneZlWTsfhItq3nJTgjqhKmiyNmFnc0uCdrm ihQ2rgGxQ6dGdBQ2J+g2Qo0xtIxVXEe0QhYlqgfS66Ev3MJX1HrbpbNcvtp6mrmqIxvX kzTDXd44M+mWAXRHr33Il3/u6ugeL/eTZybPYMaxQHue6rImJZTmMKMQRCgZNaNBH8Ek 9ANg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKgQp8DXxHDolPdWvg7fdDP3GdxlG4t6ENTm9JSlZG7d3Rmv5xKYfgMVQAhxPme44Xn
X-Received: by 10.84.229.72 with SMTP id d8mr26349200pln.21.1484966842526; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:47:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.75] ([113.28.175.142]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m14sm19913602pgn.19.2017.01.20.18.47.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:47:21 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <6ff03919-9584-0a48-da2e-7ded7d2aacbb@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:47:20 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5116AE7C-E0F3-473A-9FE7-B17A7FF82DA6@broadcom.com>
References: <6ff03919-9584-0a48-da2e-7ded7d2aacbb@pi.nu>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/uJVp4hIt7Xi1Yo73A3v6AK1tae4>
Cc: "detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org" <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] a quick look at the replication/discarding case for detnet flows
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>, <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 02:47:25 -0000

Loa,

Thanks for the slides. The slide 9 is exactly what I was after with my e2e PW labels. Now the question: “I don’t know if there is currently enough capabilities in LDP to merge, unless we merge all traffic with the same FEC on the same outgoing outer label.” I cannot claim expertise in LDP to be able to have any kind of educated view here. So if we are not going to be able to merge we would “waste” additional transport label between C->D? Duplicated would have been eliminated, thus there is no bandwidth impact. I do not think that would be an issue. It is no optimal but works.

- Jouni


--
Jouni Korhonen, Broadcom Ltd.
M: +1-408-391-7160

> On Jan 13, 2017, at 8:28 PM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I took a quick look at the replication / discarding case we talked about at the meeting this week.
> 
> Please remember that so far this is not a proposal, just a demonstration
> that there is at least one way of doing it.
> 
> What is there can bee revised, improved, changed or discarded if we
> find something better. Take a look a send comments.
> 
> /loa
> 
> Warning: I have a grave case of dyslexia, so any odd or inventive
> spelling is pure accident.
> -- 
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> <detnet-replication.pptx>_______________________________________________
> Detnet-dp-dt mailing list
> Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email