Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Fri, 17 February 2017 13:02 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2888A129A1C
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 05:02:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id MuoludIV45Dk for <detnet-dp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 17 Feb 2017 05:02:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141])
(using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4240129A2C
for <detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 05:02:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [122.52.25.23])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu)
by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5E7A18014F3;
Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:02:42 +0100 (CET)
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
References: <017eafad-3d74-c8f7-19cb-00027dabea9a@pi.nu>
<CAA=duU36fqem8M3W3CuFadwvcoHVx-sV2qR+TD3BKZuKcVtXvQ@mail.gmail.com>
<bda3c5f9-0795-177a-49ef-8e831b7f05ed@gmail.com>
<9e2a402c-d905-52c8-d354-c49c3664c3b7@pi.nu>
<CAA=duU0mmr110Xmi_3NSArJoFv3BLUrsvjyhuTZSrwfgedCxEw@mail.gmail.com>
<6aaaadf7-6a9e-7e95-a1e0-e479f6116db9@pi.nu>
<CAA=duU1mX4-nM5TsUNJFSRP4ZUchwYri-=7peJh59LW5zX5=Sw@mail.gmail.com>
<cd02e185-d67f-6480-5143-d9c58f432fe6@pi.nu>
<CAA=duU3fzij7ArPL4nqcxp7eaBBhbH9ReEN86cQn6kbJa9EZQg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <bdabfdd1-7ed0-176e-d4af-4e5c0610aed7@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 21:02:38 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU3fzij7ArPL4nqcxp7eaBBhbH9ReEN86cQn6kbJa9EZQg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet-dp-dt/y6GyzqRbKN5uwQPB2x5GUEwkoKw>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs
X-BeenThere: detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DetNet WG Data Plane Design Team <detnet-dp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet-dp-dt>,
<mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet-dp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt>,
<mailto:detnet-dp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 13:02:49 -0000
Andy, So different types of PW in the same tunnel would be OK? /Loa On 2017-02-17 20:56, Andrew G. Malis wrote: > Loa. > > The NSP is PW not per tunnel, right? > > > Yes, it’s per PW. > > Cheers, > Andy > > > > _______________________________________________ > Detnet-dp-dt mailing list > Detnet-dp-dt@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet-dp-dt > -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Norman Finn
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Loa Andersson
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Detnet-dp-dt] detnet LSPs and PWs Andrew G. Malis