Re: [Detnet] IETF 111 Slot Requests
Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Thu, 01 July 2021 01:41 UTC
Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41B33A0B72; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.951
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5rEpdEaOOonR; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 445E43A0B6F; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:51]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0105D54802F; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 03:41:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id EF1CE4E78F7; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 03:41:20 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 03:41:20 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Cc: DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>, Dangjuanna <dangjuanna@huawei.com>, Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>, sb@stewartbryant.com, Dirk Trossen <dirk.trossen@huawei.com>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)" <pengshuping@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <20210701014120.GA46981@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <159373570027.29538.11387984048129033777@ietfa.amsl.com> <7d044138-f7e7-f231-1a55-c0d1a909cbd2@labn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <7d044138-f7e7-f231-1a55-c0d1a909cbd2@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/1N58ChUeRCQqwqeDsOYgD9wK-8U>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] IETF 111 Slot Requests
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 01:41:33 -0000
Thanks, Lou Following up on the discussion about better bounded latency solutions for DetNet, StewartB and I have started to put together a draft attempting to explain the challenges that had led to the proposals of dang-queuing-with-multiple-cyclic-buffers (and in before qiang-DetNet-large-scale-DetNet), (and i think also stein-srtsn) and explain how exising vs. such proposed mechanisms would differ in their ability to solve those challenges and proposing a set of requirements that could translate into a a set of guidance for expanding the DetNet solution in this direction. The draft is tentatively called draft-eckert-detnet-bounded-latency-problems and will be submitted before the 12th deadline. I would hereby like to ask for a 10..15 minute slot for this draft/topic. I guess the bounded latency topic might be better for the DetNet slot, given how MPLS is just one encap option to consider for DetNet, and while Stewrt and I actually do exemplify with MPLS in the draft for deployment experience (and our own preferences) reasons, we wouldn' want to shortcut any preferences of the DetNet WG wrt. to which packet formats should be prioritie wrt to the bounded latency issue. Cheers Toerless On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 09:29:49AM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: > WG, > > The *draft* agenda for IETF111 has been posted - > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/agenda > > We also have a joint session being run by the pals WG, focusing on > cross-group MPLS issues: > > TUESDAY, July 27, 2021 Session III 1600-1800 (UTC) > Room 6 RTG pals Pseudowire And LDP-enabled > Services WG - Joint PALS/MPLS/DetNet > > The PALS chairs will coordinate the agenda for this session > > The DetNet session information is: > > Session 1 (1:00 requested) > FRIDAY, July 30, 2021 Session II 14:30-15:30 (UTC) > > iCalendar: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/sessions/detnet.ics > > This will be fully remote meeting. Our plan is to focus on updates, > summarizing open issues, and new topics. > > Please send slot requests to detnet-chairs@ietf.org before the end of > the day Sunday, July 11 (any TZ). Please include draft names(s), > presenter, desired slot length. Also, please let us know if you think the > topic would be better covered in a Virtual Interim to be held at a future > date. > > Thank you ! > > Lou (Janos and Ethan) > > Important dates: > IETF 111: 2021-07-24, Online, US > 2021-06-30 (Wednesday): Cut-off date for requests to reschedule Working > Group or BOF meetings UTC 23:59. > 2021-07-02 (Friday): Final agenda to be published. > 2021-07-12 (Monday): Standard rate registration and payment cut-off at UTC > 23:59.. > 2021-07-12 (Monday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all drafts, > including -00) by UTC 23:59. Upload using the ID Submission Tool. > 2021-07-14 (Wednesday): Draft Working Group agendas due by UTC 23:59. Upload > using the Meeting Materials Management Tool. > 2021-07-19 (Monday): Revised Working Group agendas due by UTC 23:59. Upload > using the Meeting Materials Management Tool. > 2021-07-19 (Monday): Registration cancellation cut-off at UTC 23:59. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > detnet mailing list > detnet@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet -- --- tte@cs.fau.de
- [Detnet] detnet - Requested session has been sche… "IETF Secretariat"
- [Detnet] IETF 108 Slot Requests Lou Berger
- [Detnet] IETF 110 Slot Requests Lou Berger
- Re: [Detnet] IETF 110 Slot Requests Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Detnet] IETF 110 Slot Requests Lou Berger
- Re: [Detnet] IETF 110 Slot Requests Janos Farkas
- Re: [Detnet] IETF 110 Slot Requests Greg Mirsky
- [Detnet] IETF 111 Slot Requests Lou Berger
- Re: [Detnet] IETF 111 Slot Requests Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Detnet] IETF 111 Slot Requests Dangjuanna
- Re: [Detnet] IETF 111 Slot Requests Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Detnet] IETF 111 Slot Requests gregory.mirsky
- [Detnet] IETF 112 Slot Requests Lou Berger
- Re: [Detnet] IETF 112 Slot Requests Greg Mirsky
- [Detnet] IETF 114 Slot Requests Lou Berger
- [Detnet] IETF 115 Slot Requests Lou Berger
- [Detnet] IETF 116 Slot Requests Lou Berger
- Re: [Detnet] IETF 116 Slot Requests 姚柯翰
- Re: [Detnet] IETF 116 Slot Requests Peng Liu
- [Detnet] IETF 117 Slot Requests (DetNet and DetNe… Lou Berger
- [Detnet] IETF 117 draft agenda posted (DetNet and… Lou Berger
- Re: [Detnet] [Raw] IETF 117 draft agenda posted (… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Detnet] IETF 117 draft agenda posted (DetNet… Janos Farkas
- [Detnet] IETF 118 Slot Requests Lou Berger
- [Detnet] IETF 119 Slot Requests Lou Berger
- Re: [Detnet] IETF 119 Slot Requests Balázs Varga A
- Re: [Detnet] IETF 119 Slot Requests Lou Berger
- [Detnet] (fun) Re: IETF 119 Slot Requests Toerless Eckert